ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2023
Artificial intelligence and remote patient monitoring in US healthcare market: a literature review.
Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trustworthy AI-Powered Intrusion Detection for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Revolutionizing Heart Failure Management With Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Innovations.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Medicine: Clinical Applications, Economic Implications, and Ethical Considerations.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Digital Orthodontic Treatment Monitoring and Remote Aligner Therapy: A Paradigm Change in Contemporary Orthodontics.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- AI-driven healthcare innovations for enhancing clinical services during mass gatherings (Hajj): task force insights and future directions.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in urology: Revolutionizing diagnostics and treatment planning.Arab journal of urology · 2025Review
- Better way: initial acceptability testing of using artificial intelligence tools to accelerate development of trauma clinical guidance.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- Review
- Beyond the Pain Management Clinic: The Role of AI-Integrated Remote Patient Monitoring in Chronic Disease Management - A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) enables remote patient monitoring (RPM) which reduces costs by triaging patients to optimize hospitalization and avoid complications. The FDA regulates AI in medical devices and aims to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and transparent AI solutions.
objectivesIdentify and summarize FDA approved RPM devices to provide information for the US medical device industry based on previous approvals and the markets' needs.
methodsWe searched publicly available databases on FDA-approved RPM devices. Selection criteria were established to classify a solution as AI. Technical information was analyzed on pre-identified 16 parameters for the qualified solutions.
resultsA total of 47 RPM devices were reviewed, among which 12.8% were classified as a De Novo product and the remaining devices fell under the 510(K) FDA category. The cardiovascular (74%) AI RPM solutions dominated the US market, followed by ECG-based arrhythmia detection algorithms (59.4%), and Hemodynamics and Vital Sign monitoring algorithms (21.9%). The trend observed in the FDA rejected devices was their inability to be classified into clinically relevant categories (Criteria 2 and 3).
conclusionThe market needs more innovative RPM solutions under the De Novo category, as there are very few. The transparency is low on the technical aspect of AI algorithms. The market needs AI algorithms that can effectively classify patients rather than merely improve device functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.