Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37151302›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2017

German Health Update: New data for Germany and Europe: The background to and methodology applied in GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS.

Anke-Christine Saß, Cornelia Lange, Jonas D Finger, Jennifer Allen, Sabine Born, Jens Hoebel, Ronny Kuhnert, Stephan Müters, Jürgen Thelen, Patrick Schmich and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The subjective health of adults in Germany.Journal of health monitoring · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anke-Christine SaßRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Cornelia LangeRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Jonas D FingerRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Jennifer AllenRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine BornRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Jens HoebelRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Ronny KuhnertRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan MütersRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Jürgen ThelenRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Patrick SchmichRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Marike VargaRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Elena von der LippeRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias WetzsteinRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas ZieseRobert Koch Institute, Department for Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS is an up-to-date health survey of the adult population undertaken within the framework of the Robert Koch Institute's (RKI) health monitoring system. It uses the EHIS (European Health Interview Survey) Wave 2 questionnaire and includes four modules covering health status, health care, health determinants, and socio-economic variables. Data on nationally relevant issues is also collected. The study employs a mixed-mode design, using both online and paper-based questionnaires to gather data from 24,016 people aged 18 and above: the response rate was 26.9%. The Statistical Office of the European Union (Eurostat) provides prepared data from 28 European Union (EU) member states (plus Norway and Iceland) on the Eurostat website. National analyses for Germany are published as Fact sheets on health reporting in the Journal of Health Monitoring.

Indexed as

ADULTSEUROPEHEALTH MONITORINGHEALTH SURVEYSTUDY METHODOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID37151302
PMCPMC10161278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.