Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37151294›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Optimal sample type and number vary in small shallow lakes when targeting non-native fish environmental DNA.

Maïlys H V Picard, Anastasija Zaiko, Annabel M Tidy, David J Kelly, Georgia Thomson-Laing, Shaun P Wilkinson, Xavier Pochon, Marcus J Vandergoes, Ian Hawes, Susanna A Wood

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maïlys H V PicardSchool of Biological Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Anastasija ZaikoCoastal and Freshwater, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Annabel M TidyUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
David J KellyCoastal and Freshwater, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Georgia Thomson-LaingCoastal and Freshwater, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Shaun P WilkinsonWilderlab NZ Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand.
Xavier PochonCoastal and Freshwater, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
Marcus J VandergoesGNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Ian HawesSchool of Biological Sciences, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Susanna A WoodCoastal and Freshwater, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-native fish have been shown to have deleterious impacts on freshwater ecosystems in New Zealand. Early detection is critical for their effective management. Traditional capture-based techniques may not detect newly introduced fish, especially if they are present in low abundance. Molecular techniques that target environmental DNA (eDNA) have been shown, in many instances, to be more sensitive, cost-effective and require lower sampling effort. However, appropriate sampling strategies are needed to ensure robust and interpretable data are obtained. In this study we used droplet digital PCR assays to investigate the presence of two non-native fish in New Zealand, the European perch (

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalPerchesAnimalsEcosystemLakesWaterDNA, EnvironmentalWaterEnvironmental DNAFishLakeNon-native speciesOccupancy modellingPerca fluviatilisSampling designScardinius erythrophthalmusSedimentary DNA

Identifiers

PMID37151294
PMCPMC10162041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.