ArticleIndian journal of dermatology
Evaluation of ELISA BP180 and BP230 Autoantibodies in Blister Fluid and Serum in the Diagnosis of Bullous Pemphigoid.
Article in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Diagnosis of Pemphigoid and Pemphigus: A Comparative Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a chronic subepidermal immunobullous disorder. Studies have demonstrated the presence of antibasement membrane zone antibodies (BP180 & BP230) in the blister fluid using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To detect and compare BP 180 and BP 230 autoantibodies in the blister fluid and serum of patients with BP by ELISA method. A total of 30 patients diagnosed as BP and not on treatment were included in the study. Blister fluid and serum were subjected to ELISA, and the results were compared. The sensitivity of ELISA BP 180 was found to be 95.8% in the blister fluid and 88.4% in the serum. The sensitivity of ELISA BP 230 in the blister fluid and serum was 20% and 16.6%, respectively. Association between ELISA antibodies done in blister and serum was analysed using Chi-square test and found to be statistically significant with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.