Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37151086›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2023

Supplementation of caffeine and sodium bicarbonate together could not improve performance and performance-related factors in CrossFit participants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Amirhosein Ziyaiyan, Fatemeh Shabkhiz, Martin Hofmeister

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amirhosein ZiyaiyanDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0190-762X
Fatemeh ShabkhizDepartment of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1183-9517
Martin HofmeisterDepartment Food and Nutrition, Consumer Centre of the German Federal State of Bavaria, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0693-7887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCrossFit includes weightlifting, powerlifting, and gymnastics in various combinations of overloads and repetitions with limited rest periods or no rest between training sets. Due to the novelty of CrossFit, there are few studies on the effect of nutritional strategies on the acute response to this type of sports activity. This study examined the effect of caffeine (CAF) and sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO

methodIn a double-blind, crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 20 CrossFit participants underwent five experimental conditions, including control (CON), placebo (PLA), CAF, NaHCO

resultsThe performance of CrossFit participants during the Cindy protocol was not significantly improved following CAF, NaHCO

conclusionCAF + NaHCO

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceCaffeineAdultCross-Over StudiesDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodHand StrengthHumansPolyestersSodium BicarbonateYoung AdultCaffeinePolyestersSodium Bicarbonatemuscle strengthsports nutritionSports performancesupplementation

Identifiers

PMID37151086
PMCPMC10167875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.