Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37151084›Full record

Trial reportBJS open2023

Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial.

Ahmed Fawzy, M Ashraf Balbaa, Mahmoud Hagag

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05452837 (Free Dermal Fat Graft), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05452837 nacompletednot on this map

Free Dermal Fat Graft (FDFG) Versus Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System (SMAS) Flap After Superficial Parotidectomy; Evaluation of Functional and Esthetic Outcome

TypeinterventionalSponsorMenoufia UniversityRan2016 to 2021Enrolled78ConditionsFrey SyndromeArmsFDFG, SMAS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ahmed FawzyDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Menoufia, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8184-6064
M Ashraf BalbaaDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Menoufia, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9340-807X
Mahmoud HagagDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Menoufia, Egypt.
Menoufia University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParotidectomy is the standard procedure for treatment of many parotid lesions; however, it has several drawbacks. Facial asymmetry and Frey's syndrome are the most annoying complications to patients. Insertion of interpositioning grafts into the parotidectomy bed can decrease these complications significantly. Free dermal fat graft (FDFG) and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap have very promising results. This RCT aimed to compare these two techniques regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes.

methodsBetween February 2016 and October 2021, adult patients undergoing superficial conservative parotidectomy in a single centre for a benign indication were randomized into two equal groups using a closed envelope method. In one group, FDFG was inserted at the parotidectomy bed, whereas, in the other group, SMAS flap was performed. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were recorded and analysed. The primary outcome was the development of Frey's syndrome.

resultsSeventy-eight patients were randomized into two equal groups of 39 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding development of Frey's syndrome. There was no significant statistical difference between study groups regarding demographic data, co-morbidities, parotid pathologies, specimen volumes, total operating time, and postoperative complications. A tendency for over correction was observed in FDFG and under correction in SMAS flap. There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups regarding the patients' aesthetic satisfaction with the majority displaying excellent satisfaction with no poor results.

conclusionFDFG and SMAS flap are simple, rapid, and reliable procedures and are effective in improving both functional and aesthetic outcomes post-parotidectomy. They have comparable results; however, selection of either procedure can be determined according to patient and tumour characteristics. Registration number: NCT05452837 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Parotid NeoplasmsSuperficial Musculoaponeurotic SystemSweating, GustatoryAdultEstheticsHumansSurgical Flaps

Identifiers

PMID37151084
PMCPMC10165060
OpenAlexW4375855355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.