ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2023
Retraction.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ma, H., Li, S.-Y., Xu, P., Babcock, S.A., Dolence, E.K., Brownlee, M., Li, J. and Ren, J. (2009), Advanced glycation endproduct (AGE) accumulation and AGE receptor (RAGE) up-regulation contribute to the onset of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 13: 1751-1764. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00547.x. The above article, published online on 13 October 2008 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between, the journal Editor in Chief, Stefan Constantinescu, The Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, and John Wiley and Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed as requested by The University of Wyoming. Following a review, a university investigation committee found evidence of data irregularities and image reuse in Figure 5 that significantly affect the results and conclusions reported in the manuscript. As a result, the article's conclusions can no longer be considered valid.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.