Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37150809›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2023

Effects of dietary supplementation of bacteriophage cocktail on health status of weanling pigs in a non-sanitary environment.

YoHan Choi, Abdolreza Hosseindoust, Sang Hun Ha, Joeun Kim, YeJin Min, YongDae Jeong, JunYoung Mun, SooJin Sa, JinSoo Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of DietaryVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

YoHan Choi *Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, 31000, Republic of Korea.
Abdolreza Hosseindoust *Department of Animal Industry Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Sang Hun HaDepartment of Animal Industry Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
Joeun KimSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, 31000, Republic of Korea.
YeJin MinSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, 31000, Republic of Korea.
YongDae JeongSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, 31000, Republic of Korea.
JunYoung MunDepartment of Animal Industry Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea.
SooJin SaSwine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan, 31000, Republic of Korea. soojinsa@korea.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2634-5109
JinSoo KimDepartment of Animal Industry Convergence, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 24341, Republic of Korea. kjs896@kangwon.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-7917

Funding

RDA PJ01497202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study evaluated the effects of bacteriophage cocktail (BP) and ZnO administered during weaning time for piglets exposed to a non-sanitary environment. The bacteriophages were designed to eliminate Escherichia coli (K88, K99 and F41), Salmonella (typhimurium and enteritidis), and Clostridium perfreingens (types A and C). Forty 21-day-old crossbreed piglets were assigned to four treatments, including the PC (sanitary environment), NC (non-sanitary environment), BP (NC plus 10

resultsPigs in the BP and ZO treatments had a higher final body weight compared with the NC. The NC treatment showed the highest concentration of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α in the plasma. The administration of BP and ZO showed lower myeloperoxidase concentrations compared with the NC. The NC treatment showed a lower concentration of superoxide dismutase in serum compared with the PC. Among the treatments in non-sanitary environment, the NC treatment showed a higher concentration of malondialdehyde compared with the ZO. The PC treatment showed a lower concentration of butyric acid in the feces compared with the BP treatment. Among non-sanitary treatments, the villus height in the duodenum was greater in the BP and ZO compared with the NC. The lower abundance of Proteobacteria phylum was observed in the BP and PC treatments compared with the NC. The highest relative abundance of Eubacterium was recorded in the BP treatment. The abundance of Megasphaera and Schwartzia was higher in the NC pigs compared with the BP piglets. The abundance of Desulfovibrio was lower in the supplemented treatments (BP and ZO) compared with non-supplemented (NC and PC). The abundance of Cellulosilyticum genera was higher in the BP and ZO treatments rather than in the NC. The piglets in the NC treatment had the highest abundance of Escherichia-Shigella, followed by the PC and ZO treatments.

conclusionIn conclusion, these results suggest that the supplementation of bacteriophage cocktail could effectively control Proteobacteria phylum, Clostridium spp. and coliforms population and mitigated the adverse influences of weaning stress in piglets.

Indexed as

AntioxidantCytokinesDiarrheaFecal scoreInflammationMicrobiotaProteobacteria

Identifiers

PMID37150809
PMCPMC10165815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.