Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37150779›Full record

ReviewEuropean radiology experimental2023

Data infrastructures for AI in medical imaging: a report on the experiences of five EU projects.

Haridimos Kondylakis, Varvara Kalokyri, Stelios Sfakianakis, Kostas Marias, Manolis Tsiknakis, Ana Jimenez-Pastor, Eduardo Camacho-Ramos, Ignacio Blanquer, J Damian Segrelles, Sergio López-Huguet and 23 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Technological Advances in Pre-Operative Planning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Haridimos KondylakisFORTH-ICS, FORTH-ICS, N. Plastira 100, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. kondylak@ics.forth.gr.ORCID 0000-0002-9917-4486
Varvara KalokyriFORTH-ICS, FORTH-ICS, N. Plastira 100, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Stelios SfakianakisFORTH-ICS, FORTH-ICS, N. Plastira 100, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Kostas MariasFORTH-ICS, FORTH-ICS, N. Plastira 100, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Manolis TsiknakisFORTH-ICS, FORTH-ICS, N. Plastira 100, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Ana Jimenez-PastorQuibim SL, Valencia, Spain.
Eduardo Camacho-RamosQuibim SL, Valencia, Spain.
Ignacio BlanquerUniversitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
J Damian SegrellesUniversitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Sergio López-HuguetUniversitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Caroline BarelleEuropean Dynamics, Maroussi, Athens, Greece.
Magdalena Kogut-CzarkowskaTimelex CVBA, Brussels, Belgium.
Gianna TsakouMAGGIOLI S.P.A., Research and Development Lab, Marousi, Greece.
Nikolaos SiopisCentre of Research & Technology - Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thermi - Thessaloniki, Greece.
Zisis SakellariouCentre of Research & Technology - Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thermi - Thessaloniki, Greece.
Paschalis BizopoulosCentre of Research & Technology - Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thermi - Thessaloniki, Greece.
Vicky DrossouCentre of Research & Technology - Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thermi - Thessaloniki, Greece.
Antonios LalasCentre of Research & Technology - Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thermi - Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos VotisCentre of Research & Technology - Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, Thermi - Thessaloniki, Greece.
Pedro MallolLa Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Luis Marti-BonmatiLa Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Leonor Cerdá AlberichLa Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Karine SeymourMedexprim, Labège, France.
Samuel BoucherMedexprim, Labège, France.
Esther CiarrocchiDepartment of Physics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Lauren FromontEuropean Genome-Phenome Archive, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi RamblaEuropean Genome-Phenome Archive, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Alexander HarmsErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrea GutierrezErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn P A StarmansErasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Fred PriorDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Josep Ll GelpiUniversity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Karim LekadirUniversity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the field of medical imaging and has the potential to bring medicine from the era of 'sick-care' to the era of healthcare and prevention. The development of AI requires access to large, complete, and harmonized real-world datasets, representative of the population, and disease diversity. However, to date, efforts are fragmented, based on single-institution, size-limited, and annotation-limited datasets. Available public datasets (e.g., The Cancer Imaging Archive, TCIA, USA) are limited in scope, making model generalizability really difficult. In this direction, five European Union projects are currently working on the development of big data infrastructures that will enable European, ethically and General Data Protection Regulation-compliant, quality-controlled, cancer-related, medical imaging platforms, in which both large-scale data and AI algorithms will coexist. The vision is to create sustainable AI cloud-based platforms for the development, implementation, verification, and validation of trustable, usable, and reliable AI models for addressing specific unmet needs regarding cancer care provision. In this paper, we present an overview of the development efforts highlighting challenges and approaches selected providing valuable feedback to future attempts in the area.Key points• Artificial intelligence models for health imaging require access to large amounts of harmonized imaging data and metadata.• Main infrastructures adopted either collect centrally anonymized data or enable access to pseudonymized distributed data.• Developing a common data model for storing all relevant information is a challenge.• Trust of data providers in data sharing initiatives is essential.• An online European Union meta-tool-repository is a necessity minimizing effort duplication for the various projects in the area.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeoplasmsBig DataDiagnostic ImagingForecastingHumansArtificial intelligenceData anonymizationData managementDiagnostic imagingNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37150779
PMCPMC10164664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.