Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37150667›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2023

Sarcomatoid Urothelial Carcinoma Is Associated With Limited Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Poor Oncologic Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy.

Rishi R Sekar, Leonidas N Diamantopoulos, Dimitra R Bakaloudi, Ali R Khaki, Petros Grivas, Brian R Winters, Funda Vakar-Lopez, Maria S Tretiakova, Sarah P Psutka, Sarah K Holt and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rishi R SekarDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: rsekar@med.umich.edu.
Leonidas N DiamantopoulosDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Dimitra R BakaloudiDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Ali R KhakiDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
Petros GrivasDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Brian R WintersDepartment of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Bellevue, Washington.
Funda Vakar-LopezDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Maria S TretiakovaDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Sarah P PsutkaFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Sarah K HoltDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
John L GoreFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Daniel W LinFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
George R SchadeFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Andrew C HsiehDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
John K LeeDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Todd YezefskiDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Michael T SchweizerDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Heather H ChengDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Evan Y YuDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Lawrence D TrueDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
R Bruce MontgomeryDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Jonathan L WrightFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · USKaiser Permanente · USStanford University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

TRAINING IN CANCER BIOLOGY &TRANSPLANTATIONT32CA009515 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NANCY ELLEN DAVIDSON, Effie W Petersdorf · 1985 to 2026
$16.2M
Transcriptional-translational conflict in bladder epithelial homeostasis and cancerR01CA276308 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI Andrew Caleb Hsieh · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA276308NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo examine oncologic outcomes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC) treated with radical cystectomy (RC). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively queried our institutional database (2003-18) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare (2004-2015) for patients with cT2-4, N0-2, M0 SUC and conventional UC (CUC) treated with RC. Clinicopathologic characteristics were described using descriptive statistics (t test, χ2-test and log-rank-test for group comparison). Overall (OS) and recurrence-free-survival (RFS) after RC were estimated with the Kaplan Meier method and associations with OS were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsWe identified 38 patients with SUC and 287 patients with CUC in our database, and 190 patients with SUC in SEER-Medicare. In the institutional cohort, patients with SUC versus CUC had higher rates of pT3/4 stage (66% vs. 35%, P < 0.001), lower rates of ypT0N0 (6% vs. 35%, P = .02), and worse median OS (17.5 vs. 120 months, P < .001). Further, patients with SUC in the institutional versus SEER-Medicare cohort had similar median OS (17.5 vs. 21 months). In both cohorts, OS was comparable between patients with SUC undergoing NAC+RC vs. RC alone (17.5 vs. 18.4 months, P = .98, institutional cohort; 24 vs. 20 months, P = .56, SEER cohort). In Cox proportional hazards models for the institutional RC cohort, SUC was independently associated with worse OS (HR 2.3, CI 1.4-3.8, P = .001).

conclusionSUC demonstrates poor pathologic response to NAC and worse OS compared with CUC, with no OS benefit associated with NAC. A unique pattern of rapid abdominopelvic cystic recurrence was identified.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedCystectomyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMedicareNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesBladder cancer, Neoadjuvant therapyUrinary bladder neoplasms, Sarcomatoid histology

Identifiers

PMID37150667
PMCPMC10621753
OpenAlexW4362576952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.