Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37150505›Full record

ArticleChest2023

Emulating Target Trials Comparing Early and Delayed Intubation Strategies.

Kerollos Nashat Wanis, Arin L Madenci, Sicheng Hao, Mira Moukheiber, Lama Moukheiber, Dana Moukheiber, Sulaiman Moukheiber, Jessica G Young, Leo Anthony Celi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chest, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Airway management strategies in critical care.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kerollos Nashat WanisDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada. Electronic address: knwanis@g.harvard.edu.
Arin L MadenciDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Sicheng HaoLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Mira MoukheiberThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Lama MoukheiberInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Dana MoukheiberInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Sulaiman MoukheiberDepartment of Computer Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA.
Jessica G YoungDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.
Leo Anthony CeliDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Laboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

Funding

Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether intubation should be initiated early in the clinical course of critically ill patients remains a matter of debate. Results from prior observational studies are difficult to interpret because of avoidable flaws including immortal time bias, inappropriate eligibility criteria, and unrealistic treatment strategies. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do treatment strategies that intubate patients early in the critical care admission improve 30-day survival compared with strategies that delay intubation? STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe estimated the effect of strategies that require early intubation of critically ill patients compared with those that delay intubation. With data extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV database, we emulated three target trials, varying the flexibility of the treatment strategies and the baseline eligibility criteria.

resultsUnder unrealistically strict treatment strategies with broad eligibility criteria, the 30-day mortality risk was 7.1 percentage points higher for intubating early compared with delaying intubation (95% CI, 6.2-7.9). Risk differences were 0.4 (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.9) and -0.9 (95% CI, -2.5 to 0.7) percentage points in subsequent target trial emulations that included more realistic treatment strategies and eligibility criteria.

interpretationWhen realistic treatment strategies and eligibility criteria are used, strategies that delay intubation result in similar 30-day mortality risks compared with those that intubate early. Delaying intubation ultimately avoids intubation in most patients.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessNoninvasive VentilationCritical CareHumansIntubation, IntratrachealRespiration, Artificialcausal inferencehigh-flow nasal cannulaintubationmachine learningnoninvasive ventilationtarget trial

Identifiers

PMID37150505
PMCPMC10567927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.