Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37150260›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023

Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis of Toxicity by Dose-Fractionation in the RADICALS-RT Trial.

Peter Meidahl Petersen, Adrian D Cook, Matthew R Sydes, Noel Clarke, William Cross, Howard Kynaston, John Logue, Peter Neville, Patient Representative, Heather Payne and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07483658 (Non-Inferiority Study Comparing Hypofractionated Post-Operative Salvage Radiotherapy Regimens), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07483658 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Non-Inferiority Study Comparing Hypofractionated Post-Operative Salvage Radiotherapy Regimens: 45/62.5 Gy in 25 Fractions vs. 43/52.5 Gy in 20 Fractions for Grade 2+ GU or GI Toxicity (HYP-OP-RT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2026 to 2036Enrolled434ConditionsReccurent/Metastatic Solid Tumor Disease, Prostate Cancer (Post Prostatectomy), Prostate Cancer, Prostatic NeoplasmsArmsStandard Fractionation Post-Operative Salvage Radiotherapy (25 fractions), Hypofractionated Post-Operative Salvage Radiotherapy (20 fractions), Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter Meidahl PetersenDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: Peter.meidahl.petersen@regionh.dk.
Adrian D CookMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew R SydesMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Noel ClarkeDepartment of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
William CrossDepartment of Urology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Howard KynastonUniversity Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
John LogueChristie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Peter NevilleMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Patient Representative
Heather PayneUniversity College London, The Prostate Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Mahesh K B ParmarMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wendy ParulekarCanadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Rajendra PersadBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Fred SaadUrologic Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Alan StirlingCastle Hill Hospital, Castle Road, Cottingham, United Kingdom.
Christopher C ParkerThe Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS, Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom.
Charles CattonRadiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBCastle Hill Hospital · GBCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAMedical Research Council · GBQueen's University · CARigshospitalet · DKRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSalford Royal Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 6381Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_00004/02Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/28
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmerging data indicate comparable disease control and toxicity of normal postoperative fractionation and moderate hypofractionation radiation therapy (RT) in prostate cancer. In RADICALS-RT, patients were planned for treatment with either 66 Gy in 33 fractions (f) over 6.5 weeks or 52.5 Gy in 20f over 4 weeks. This non-randomized, exploratory analysis explored the toxicity of these 2 schedules in patients who had adjuvant RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Information on RT dose was collected in all patients. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity score was recorded every 4 months for 2 years, every 6 months until 5 years, then annually until 15 years. Patient-reported data were collected at baseline and at 1, 5, and 10 years using standard measures, including the Vaizey fecal incontinence score (bowel) and the International Continence Society Male Short-Form questionnaire (urinary incontinence). The highest event grade was recorded within the first 2 years and beyond 2 years and compared between treatment groups using the χ² test.

resultsOf 634 patients, 217 (34%) were planned for 52.5 Gy/20f and 417 (66%) for 66 Gy/33f. In the first 2 years, grade 1 to 2 cystitis was reported more frequently among the 66 Gy/33f group (52.5 Gy/20f: 20% vs 66 Gy/33f: 30%; P = .04). After 2 years, grade 1 to 2 cystitis was reported in 16% in the 66-Gy group and 9% in the 52.5-Gy group (P = .08). Other toxic effects were similar in the 2 groups, and very few patients had any grade 3 to 4 toxic effects. Patients reported slightly higher urinary and fecal incontinence scores at 1 year than at baseline, but no clinically meaningful differences were reported between the 52.5 Gy/20f and 66 Gy/33f groups. Patient-reported health was similar at baseline and at 1 year and similar between the 52.5 Gy/20f and 66 Gy/33f groups.

conclusionsSevere toxic effects were rare after prostate bed radiation therapy with either 52.5 Gy/20f or 66 Gy/33f. Only modest differences were recorded in toxic effects or in patient-reported outcomes between these 2 schedules.

Indexed as

CystitisFecal IncontinenceProstatic NeoplasmsDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansMaleProstateProstatectomySalvage Therapy

Identifiers

PMID37150260
PMCPMC7615125
OpenAlexW4372201905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.