Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37150179›Full record

ReviewApplied clinical informatics2023

Data Science Implementation Trends in Nursing Practice: A Review of the 2021 Literature.

Ann M Wieben, Rachel Lane Walden, Bader G Alreshidi, Sophia F Brown, Kenrick Cato, Cynthia Peltier Coviak, Christopher Cruz, Fabio D'Agostino, Brian J Douthit, Thompson H Forbes and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied clinical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Developing a clinical decision support framework for integrating predictive models into routine nursing practices in home health care for patients with heart failure.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ann M WiebenUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Rachel Lane WaldenAnnette and Irwin Eskind Family Biomedical Library, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Bader G AlreshidiMedical-Surgical Nursing Department, College of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Sophia F BrownWalden University School of Nursing, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kenrick CatoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York, United States.
Cynthia Peltier CoviakKirkhof College of Nursing, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan, United States.
Christopher CruzGlobal Health Technology and Informatics, Chevron, San Ramon, California, United States.
Fabio D'AgostinoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Brian J DouthitDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Thompson H ForbesDepartment of Advanced Nursing Practice and Education, East Carolina University College of Nursing, Greenville, North Carolina, United States.
Grace GaoAtlanta VA Quality Scholars Program, Joseph Maxwell Cleland, Atlanta VA Medical Center, North Druid Hills, Georgia, United States.
Steve G JohnsonInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Mikyoung Angela LeeTexas Woman's University College of Nursing, Denton, Texas, United States.
Margaret Mullen-FortinoPenn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Jung In ParkSue and Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California, Irvine, United States.
Suhyun ParkCollege of Nursing and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.
Lisiane PruinelliCollege of Nursing and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States.
Anita Reger
Jethrone RoleLoma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, United States.
Marisa SileoBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Mary Anne SchultzCalifornia State University, Long Beach, California, United States.
Pankaj VyasUniversity of Arizona College of Nursing, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Alvin D JefferyU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.

Funding

Learning Health System Scholar Program at VanderbiltK12HS026395 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROTHMAN, RUSSELL L., ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe goal of this work was to provide a review of the implementation of data science-driven applications focused on structural or outcome-related nurse-sensitive indicators in the literature in 2021. By conducting this review, we aim to inform readers of trends in the nursing indicators being addressed, the patient populations and settings of focus, and lessons and challenges identified during the implementation of these tools.

methodsWe conducted a rigorous descriptive review of the literature to identify relevant research published in 2021. We extracted data on model development, implementation-related strategies and measures, lessons learned, and challenges and stakeholder involvement. We also assessed whether reports of data science application implementations currently follow the guidelines of the Developmental and Exploratory Clinical Investigations of DEcision support systems driven by AI (DECIDE-AI) framework.

resultsOf 4,943 articles found in PubMed (NLM) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost), 11 were included in the final review and data extraction. Systems leveraging data science were developed for adult patient populations and were primarily deployed in hospital settings. The clinical domains targeted included mortality/deterioration, utilization/resource allocation, and hospital-acquired infections/COVID-19. The composition of development teams and types of stakeholders involved varied. Research teams more frequently reported on implementation methods than implementation results. Most studies provided lessons learned that could help inform future implementations of data science systems in health care.

conclusionIn 2021, very few studies report on the implementation of data science-driven applications focused on structural- or outcome-related nurse-sensitive indicators. This gap in the sharing of implementation strategies needs to be addressed in order for these systems to be successfully adopted in health care settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Data ScienceAdultDelivery of Health CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID37150179
PMCPMC10411069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.