Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37150102›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2023

Unbiased and efficient sampling of timeseries reveals redundancy of brain network and gradient structure.

Aditya Nanda, Mikail Rubinov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aditya NandaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, USA. Electronic address: aditya.nanda@vanderbilt.edu.
Mikail RubinovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, USA; Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, USA; Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, USA. Electronic address: mika.rubinov@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Integrative analysis of multiomic datasets for discovery of molecular underpinnings of large-scale human brain networksRF1MH125933 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI RUBINOV, MIKAIL · 2021 to 2021
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH125933NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies in human neuroscience seek to understand the structure of brain networks and gradients. Few studies, however, have tested the redundancy between these outwardly distinct features. Here, we developed methods to directly enable such tests. We built on insights from linear algebra to develop methods for unbiased and efficient sampling of timeseries with network or gradient constraints. We used these methods to show considerable redundancy between popular definitions of network and gradient structure in functional MRI data. On the one hand, we found that network constraints largely accounted for the structure of three major gradients. On the other hand, we found that gradient constraints largely accounted for the structure of seven major networks. Our results imply that some networks and gradients may denote discrete and continuous representations of the same aspects of functional MRI data. We suggest that integrated explanations can reduce redundancy by avoiding the attribution of independent existence or function to these features.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansNerve Net

Identifiers

PMID37150102
PMCPMC12884839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.