Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37149831›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

PROPELLER diffusion weighted imaging for diagnosis of cholesteatoma in comparison with surgical and histopathological results: emphasis on false positivity and false negativity.

Aslihan Semiz-Oysu, Cagatay Oysu, Fatma Kulali, Yasar Bukte

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aslihan Semiz-OysuDepartment of Radiology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. asoysu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6219-7097
Cagatay OysuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6756-8456
Fatma KulaliDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-6907
Yasar BukteDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3894-7107
Marmara University · TRÜmraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the role of non-echo planar diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) using "periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction" (PROPELLER) sequence for the diagnosis of cholesteatoma compared to surgical and histopathological results in an attempt to determine the factors causing false negative and false positive diagnoses.

methodsPatients who had PROPELLER DWI before ear surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of a lesion with diffusion restriction on PROPELLER DWI was accepted as positive for cholesteatoma, and the results were compared to the intraoperative and histopathological findings.

resultsA total of 112 ears in 109 patients were reviewed. On PROPELLER DWI, a lesion with diffusion restriction was found in 101 (90.2%) ears, while in 11 (9.8%) of the patients, no diffusion restriction was found. Surgery and histopathological analysis revealed a cholesteatoma in 100 (89.3%) ears, while in 12 (10.7%) ears, no cholesteatoma was found surgically. There were 96 (85.7%) true positives, 7 (6.2%) true negatives, 5 (4.5%) false positives and 4 (3.6%) false negatives. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of non-echo planar DWI were calculated to be 91.96%, 96%, 58.33%, 95.05%, and 63.64%, respectively.

conclusionNon-echo planar DWI using PROPELLER sequence has high accuracy, sensitivity and positive predictive value and can be used for the detection of cholesteatoma. The external auditory canal, postoperative ears and small lesions should be evaluated with caution to avoid false results.

Indexed as

Cholesteatoma, Middle EarDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCholesteatomaDiagnostic imagingDiffusion weighted magnetic resonance imagingOtologic surgical proceduresTemporal bone

Identifiers

PMID37149831
OpenAlexW4375846859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.