Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37149815›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2023

Management of Fusarium Wilt Disease of Maize (Zea mays L.) with Selected Antimycotic Plant Extracts and Inhibitory Bacillus Strains.

Deborah Ebunoluwa Adedire, Temitope Esther Owoeye, Omobola Muyiwa Farinu, Wuraola Funmi Ogundipe, Oluwafemi Michael Adedire

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Control ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah Ebunoluwa AdedireDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Biotechnology Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.
Temitope Esther OwoeyeSouthwest Center, National Biotechnology Development Agency, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Omobola Muyiwa FarinuDepartment of Biochemistry, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria.
Wuraola Funmi OgundipeSchool of Agriculture, Federal College of Agriculture, Apata, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Oluwafemi Michael AdedireSchool of Agriculture, Federal College of Agriculture, Apata, Ibadan, Nigeria. Fecky09@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7552-8817
Federal University of Technology · NGForestry Research Institute of Nigeria · NGMichael Okpara University of Agriculture · NGNational Primary Health Care Development Agency · NGUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L. var. Everta) is an economically significant crop cultivated worldwide. Unfortunately, microbial diseases, especially, mycopathogens such as Fusarium species, militate against the production of maize. Protective microbial species and bioactive plant extracts have been studied in the control of plant pathogens. However, there is a dearth of information on their comparative efficacy and effect on wilt disease of maize caused by Fusarium solani, as investigated in this study. Using the ITS and 16s rDNA primers for fungal pathogen and bacterial strains, respectively, the mycopathogen was confirmed as Fusarium solani FCI20, while biocontrol Bacillus strains were identified as Bacillus velezensis EBs02 and Bacillus thuringiensis EBs04. Fusarium solani FCI20 successfully infected maize seedlings through rhizosphere inoculation, and caused severe leaf chlorosis, necrosis and wilt in maize seedlings. Bacillus thuringiensis EBs04 expressed the highest in vitro mycelial inhibition (85.20%), followed by Gmelina arborea (78.58%), while Milicia excelsa appeared to express the lowest mycelial inhibition potential (49.95%). Bacillus velezensis EBs02 expressed the highest in vivo disease severity reduction in maize seedlings (with percentage disease control of 84.16), while B. thuringiensis-treated plants had the lowest incidence of wilt disease (4.32%). However, contrary to their in vitro mycelial inhibition potential, B. velezensis EBs02, Gmelina arborea, Milicia excelsa and Cola nitida expressed radically different levels of in vivo wilt disease control in maize seedlings. Consequent upon the biocontrol patterns observed in this study, in vivo assay should be considered in the preliminary selection of promising biocontrol agents against phytopathogens, such as Fusarium species.

Indexed as

BacillusFusariumPlant DiseasesPlantsZea mays

Identifiers

PMID37149815
OpenAlexW4375846676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.