ArticleThe Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology2023
Validation of radiographic visibility of root pulp in mandibular first, second and third molars in the prediction of 21 years in a sample of south Indian population: A digital panoramic radiographic study.
Article in The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiographic root pulp visibility of the mandibular left second molar as an indicator of legal adulthood (≥ 18 Years): a panoramic study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Age estimation at 18-year threshold: comparing Demirjian and Cameriere's methods for Thais.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the radiographic visibility of root pulp (RPV) in lower first, second and third molars to validate the completion of 21 years. RPV in all lower three molars of both sides was assessed using a sample of 930 orthopantomograms of individuals aged between 15 and 30. The scoring of RPV was done using the Olze et al. four-stage classification (Int J Legal Med 124(3):183-186, 2010). Cut-off values were determined for each molar using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The selected cut-off values were stage 3 for the first molar, stage 2 for the second molar and stage 1 for the third molar. For lower first molar, the AUC was 0.702, and the sensitivity, specificity and posttest probability (PTP) were 60.1%, 98.8% and 98.1% in males, and 64.5%, 99.1% and 98.6% in females. For lower second molar, the AUC was 0.828, and the sensitivity, specificity and PTP were 75.5%, 97% and 96.2% in males, and 74.4%, 96.3% and 95.3% in females. For the lower third molar, the AUC was 0.906; the sensitivity was 74.1% and 64.4% in males and females, while specificity and PTP were 100% in both sexes. The accuracy of predictions for the completion of 21 years was high. However, the greater percentage of false negatives and inapplicability of this method in one-third of lower-third molars have been recommended for using this method in conjunction with other dental or skeletal methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37149753PMC10319095What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.