Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37149649›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Deep learning-based inverse design of microstructured materials for optical optimization and thermal radiation control.

Jonathan Sullivan, Arman Mirhashemi, Jaeho Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jonathan SullivanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Arman MirhashemiNASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jaeho LeeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. jaeholee@uci.edu.

Funding

NASA 80NSSC19K1671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microstructures with engineered properties are critical to thermal management in aerospace and space applications. Due to the overwhelming number of microstructure design variables, traditional approaches to material optimization can have time-consuming processes and limited use cases. Here, we combine a surrogate optical neural network with an inverse neural network and dynamic post-processing to form an aggregated neural network inverse design process. Our surrogate network emulates finite-difference time-domain simulations (FDTD) by developing a relationship between the microstructure's geometry, wavelength, discrete material properties, and the output optical properties. The surrogate optical solver works in tandem with an inverse neural network to predict a microstructure's design properties that will match an input optical spectrum. As opposed to conventional approaches that are constrained by material selection, our network can identify new material properties that best optimize the input spectrum and match the output to an existing material. The output is evaluated using critical design constraints, simulated in FDTD, and used to retrain the surrogate-forming a self-learning loop. The presented framework is applicable to the inverse design of various optical microstructures, and the deep learning-derived approach will allow complex and user-constrained optimization for thermal radiation control in future aerospace and space systems.

Identifiers

PMID37149649
PMCPMC10164128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.