Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37149628›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2023

Evaluation of multigene assays as predictors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Jincong Q Freeman, Sarah Shubeck, Frederick M Howard, Nan Chen, Rita Nanda, Dezheng Huo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Addressing Social Determinants in the Era of Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer: Is It Sufficient to Reduce Disparities?Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jincong Q FreemanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1119-2146
Sarah ShubeckDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Frederick M HowardDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology & Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6039-1141
Nan ChenDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology & Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rita NandaDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology & Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-0876
Dezheng HuoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. dhuo@bsd.uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4041-1678

Funding

Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) BCRF-22-071Susan G. Komen (Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation) TREND21675016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OncotypeDX and MammaPrint assays have not been validated to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in early-stage breast cancer patients. We analyzed the 2010-2019 National Cancer Database and found that high OncotypeDX recurrence scores or high MammaPrint scores were associated with greater odds of pCR. Our findings suggest that OncotypeDX and MammaPrint testing predict pCR after NACT and could facilitate clinical decision-making between clinicians and patients.

Identifiers

PMID37149628
PMCPMC10164191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.