Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37149623›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Fluid Optimisation in Emergency Laparotomy (FLO-ELA) Trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised trial of cardiac output-guided fluid therapy compared to usual care in patients undergoing major emergency gastrointestinal surgery.

Mark R Edwards, Gordon Forbes, Neil Walker, Dion G Morton, Monty G Mythen, Dave Murray, Iain Anderson, Borislava Mihaylova, Ann Thomson, Matt Taylor and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Mark R EdwardsDepartment of Anaesthesia, Southampton General Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. mark.edwards2@uhs.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5048-1784
Gordon ForbesDepartment of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, King's College London, London, UK.
Neil WalkerPragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Dion G MortonAcademic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Monty G MythenUniversity College London Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Dave MurrayJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Iain AndersonSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Borislava MihaylovaHealth Economics and Policy Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Mary University of London, London, Queen, UK.
Ann ThomsonPragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Matt TaylorDepartment of Critical Care, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Marianne HollymanDepartment of Surgery, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.
Rachel PhillipsSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Keith Young, London, UK.
Brennan C KahanMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, UK.
Rupert M PearseFaculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Mary University of London, London, Queen, UK.
Michael P W GrocottPerioperative & Critical Care Research Group, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust / University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
FLO-ELA investigators
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBMusgrove Park Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBPoole Hospital · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBKing's College London · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme HTA 15/80/54Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing major emergency gastrointestinal surgery are a major burden on healthcare systems. Optimal management of perioperative intravenous fluids may reduce mortality rates and improve outcomes from surgery. Previous small trials of cardiac-output guided haemodynamic therapy algorithms in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery have suggested this intervention results in reduced complications and a modest reduction in mortality. However, this existing evidence is based mainly on elective (planned) surgery, with little evaluation in the emergency setting. There are fundamental clinical and pathophysiological differences between the planned and emergency surgical setting which may influence the effects of this intervention. A large definitive trial in emergency surgery is needed to confirm or refute the potential benefits observed in elective surgery and to inform widespread clinical practice.

methodsThe FLO-ELA trial is a multi-centre, parallel-group, open, randomised controlled trial. 3138 patients aged 50 and over undergoing major emergency gastrointestinal surgery will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using minimisation to minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring to guide protocolised administration of intra-venous fluid, or usual care without cardiac output monitoring. The trial intervention will be carried out during surgery and for up to 6 h postoperatively. The trial is funded through an efficient design call by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme and uses existing routinely collected datasets for the majority of data collection. The primary outcome is the number of days alive and out of hospital within 90 days of randomisation. Participants and those delivering the intervention will not be blinded to treatment allocation. Participant recruitment started in September 2017 with a 1-year internal pilot phase and is ongoing at the time of publication. DISCUSSION: This will be the largest contemporary randomised trial examining the effectiveness of perioperative cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy in patients undergoing major emergency gastrointestinal surgery. The multi-centre design and broad inclusion criteria support the external validity of the trial. Although the clinical teams delivering the trial interventions will not be blinded, significant trial outcome measures are objective and not subject to detection bias.

trial registrationISRCTN 14729158. Registered on 02 May 2017.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresFluid TherapyLaparotomyAgedCardiac OutputHemodynamicsHumansMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEmergency surgical procedures/adverse effectsHemodynamics/physiologyIntraoperative/methodsPostoperative complications/prevention and controlProspective studies

Identifiers

PMID37149623
PMCPMC10163929
OpenAlexW4375855703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.