Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37149606›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

An improved algorithm for inferring mutational parameters from bar-seq evolution experiments.

Fangfei Li, Aditya Mahadevan, Gavin Sherlock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fangfei LiDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, US.
Aditya MahadevanDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, US.
Gavin SherlockDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, US. gsherloc@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-4983

Funding

Multisizer 4e - equipment for "Fitness Effects of Beneficial Mutations"R35GM131824 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Gavin J Sherlock · 2019 to 2026
$3.6M
Evolution of drug resistance in Candida glabrataR01AI136992 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHERLOCK, GAVIN J · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136992NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic barcoding provides a high-throughput way to simultaneously track the frequencies of large numbers of competing and evolving microbial lineages. However making inferences about the nature of the evolution that is taking place remains a difficult task.

resultsHere we describe an algorithm for the inference of fitness effects and establishment times of beneficial mutations from barcode sequencing data, which builds upon a Bayesian inference method by enforcing self-consistency between the population mean fitness and the individual effects of mutations within lineages. By testing our inference method on a simulation of 40,000 barcoded lineages evolving in serial batch culture, we find that this new method outperforms its predecessor, identifying more adaptive mutations and more accurately inferring their mutational parameters.

conclusionOur new algorithm is particularly suited to inference of mutational parameters when read depth is low. We have made Python code for our serial dilution evolution simulations, as well as both the old and new inference methods, available on GitHub ( https://github.com/FangfeiLi05/FitMut2 ), in the hope that it can find broader use by the microbial evolution community.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremComputer SimulationMutationExperimental evolutionGenetic barcodingInference

Identifiers

PMID37149606
PMCPMC10164349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.