ReviewBMC women's health2023
A narrative review of evidence to support increased domestic resource mobilization for family planning in Nigeria.
Review in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily planning (FP) is an important public health intervention that is proven to reduce unplanned pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and maternal mortality. Increasing investments in FP would ensure stability and better maternal health outcomes in Nigeria. However, evidence is needed to make a case for more domestic investment in family planning in Nigeria. We undertook a literature review to highlight the unmet needs for family planning and the situation of its funding landscape in Nigeria. A total of 30 documents were reviewed, including research papers, reports of national surveys, programme reports, and academic/research blogs. The search for documents was performed on Google Scholar and organizational websites using predetermined keywords. Data were objectively extracted using a uniform template. Descriptive analysis was performed for quantitative data, and qualitative data were summarized using narratives. Frequencies, proportions, line graphs and illustrative chart were used to present the quantitative data. Although total fertility rate declined over time from 6.0 children per woman in 1990 to 5.3 in 2018, the gap between wanted fertility and actual fertility increased from 0.2 in 1990 to 0.5 in 2018. This is because wanted fertility rate decreased from 5.8 children per woman in 1990 to 4.8 per woman in 2018. Similarly, modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR) decreased by 0.6% from 2013 to 2018, and unmet need for family planning increased by 2.5% in the same period. Funding for family planning services in Nigeria comes from both external and internal sources in the form of cash or commodities. The nature of external assistance for family planning services depends on the preferences of funders, although there are some similarities across funders. Irrespective of the type of funder and the length of funding, donations/funds are renewed on annual basis. Procurement of commodities receives most attention for funding whereas, commodities distribution which is critical for service delivery receives poor attention.
conclusionNigeria has made slow progress in achieving its family planning targets. The heavy reliance on external donors makes funding for family planning services to be unpredictable and imbalanced. Hence, the need for more domestic resource mobilization through government funding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.