Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37149508›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2023

Open approach for ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease in the era of minimally invasive surgery: indications and perioperative outcomes in a referral center.

Giacomo Calini, Solafah Abdalla, Mohamed A Abd El Aziz, Sarah Benammi, Amit Merchea, Kevin T Behm, Kellie L Mathis, David W Larson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giacomo CaliniDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. giacomo.calini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-9578
Solafah AbdallaDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7666-9497
Mohamed A Abd El AzizDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4477-0114
Sarah BenammiDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-0794
Amit MercheaDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7880-7080
Kevin T BehmDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kellie L MathisDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
David W LarsonDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Larson.David2@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the first-line approach for ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease (CD), and it is safe and feasible, even with severe penetrating CD or redo surgery. While MIS indications are continually broadening, challenging CD cases might still require an open approach. This study aimed to report rate and indications for an upfront open approach in ileocolic resection for CD. Comprehensive perioperative data for all consecutive patients undergoing ileocolic resection for CD between 2014 and 2021 in a high-volume referral center for CD and MIS, were collected retrospectively. Indications for an upfront open approach were reviewed separately by two authors according to the preoperative visit. Among 319 ileocolic resections for CD, 45 (14%) were open and 274 (86%) MIS. Two or more of the below indications were present in 40 patients (89%) in the open group, while only in 6 patients (2%) in the MIS group (p < 0.0001). Indications for upfront open approach were severe penetrating disease (58%), adhesions at previous surgery (47%), history of abdominal sepsis (33%), multifocal and extensive disease (24%), abdominal wall involvement (22%), concomitant open procedures (9%), small bowel dilatation (9%), and anesthesiologic contraindications (4%). MIS was never performed in a patient with abdominal wall involvement, concomitant open procedure, and anesthesiologic contraindication to MIS. This study can help guide patients, physicians, and surgeons. An abdominal wall involvement or the presence of two of the above indications predicts a high surgical complexity and may be considered as a no-go for the MIS approach. These criteria should prompt surgeons to strongly consider an upfront open approach to optimize the perioperative planning and care of these complex patients.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseLaparoscopyAnastomosis, SurgicalColectomyHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeConversion to open surgeryCrohn diseaseLaparotomyMinimally invasive surgical proceduresSurgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID37149508
OpenAlexW4372329043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.