Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37148891›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Healthy longevity2023

Determinants of humoral and cellular immune responses to three doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in older adults: a longitudinal cohort study.

Anthony Ravussin, Anna Hayman Robertson, Asia-Sophia Wolf, Kristine Blix, Ingrid Fadum Kjønstad, Guri Solum, Berit Feiring, Bjørn Heine Strand, Fridtjof Lund-Johansen, Ludvig A Munthe and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anthony RavussinDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Anna Hayman RobertsonDivision of Infection Control, Section for Vaccine Epidemiology and Population Studies, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: anna.hayman.robertson@fhi.no.
Asia-Sophia WolfDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine BlixDivision of Infection Control, Section for Vaccine Epidemiology and Population Studies, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Fadum KjønstadDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Guri SolumDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Berit FeiringDivision of Infection Control, Section for Vaccine Epidemiology and Population Studies, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn Heine StrandDivision of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Fridtjof Lund-JohansenDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; ImmunoLingo Convergence Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ludvig A MuntheDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; KG Jebsen Centre for B cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Per MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Lill TrogstadDivision of Infection Control, Section for Vaccine Epidemiology and Population Studies, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Siri MjaalandDivision of Infection Control, Section for Immunology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder age is associated with poorer outcomes to COVID-19 infection. The Norwegian Institute of Public Health established a longitudinal cohort of adults aged 65-80 years to study the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we describe the characteristics of the cohort in general, and specifically the immune responses at baseline and after primary and booster vaccination in a subset of longitudinal blood samples, and the epidemiological factors affecting these responses.

methods4551 participants were recruited, with humoral (n=299) and cellular (n=90) responses measured before vaccination and after two and three vaccine doses. Information on general health, infections, and vaccinations were obtained from questionnaires and national health registries.

findingsHalf of the participants had a chronic condition. 849 (18·7%) of 4551 were prefrail and 184 (4%) of 4551 were frail. 483 (10·6%) of 4551 had general activity limitations (scored with the Global Activity Limitation Index). After dose two, 295 (98·7%) of 299 participants were seropositive for anti-receptor binding domain IgG, and 210 (100%) of 210 participants after dose three. Spike-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses showed high heterogeneity after vaccination and responded to the alpha (B.1.1.7), delta (B.1.617.2), and omicron (B.1.1.529 or BA.1) variants of concern. Cellular responses to seasonal coronaviruses increased after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Heterologous prime boosting with mRNA vaccines was associated with the highest antibody (p=0·019) and CD4 T cell responses (p=0·003), and hypertension with lower antibody levels after three doses (p=0·04).

interpretationMost older adults, including those with comorbidities, generated good serological and cellular responses after two vaccine doses. Responses further improved after three doses, particularly after heterologous boosting. Vaccination also generated cross-reactive T cells against variants of concern and seasonal coronaviruses. Frailty was not associated with impaired immune responses, but hypertension might indicate reduced responsiveness to vaccines even after three doses. Individual differences identified through longitudinal sampling enables better prediction of the variability of vaccine responses, which can help guide future policy on the need for subsequent doses and their timing.

fundingNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Norwegian Ministry of Health, Research Council of Norway, and Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAgedCohort StudiesHumansImmunity, CellularLongitudinal StudiesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID37148891
PMCPMC10156136
OpenAlexW4367836165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.