Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37148649›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2023

The progenitor basis of cortical projection neuron diversity.

Dhananjay Huilgol, Jeffrey B Russ, Sweta Srivas, Z Josh Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A conserved logic for the development of cortical layering in tetrapods.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Indirect neurogenesis in space and time.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dhananjay HuilgolDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Jeffrey B RussDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Sweta SrivasDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Z Josh HuangDepartment of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: josh.huang@duke.edu.

Funding

Tool and Technology Development CoreU19MH114821 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI HUANG, Z JOSH · 2017 to 2021
$64.5M
Child Neurologist Career Development Program (CNCDP)K12NS098482 · NINDS · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI SCHLAGGAR, BRADLEY L · 2016 to 2025
$26.2M
RNA-programmable cell-type targeting, editing, and therapyDP1MH129954 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, Z JOSH · 2021 to 2025
$5.6M
NIMH NIH HHS DP1 MH129954NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH114821NINDS NIH HHS K12 NS098482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse glutamatergic projection neurons (PNs) mediate myriad processing streams and output channels of the cerebral cortex. Yet, how different types of neural progenitors, such as radial glia (RGs) and intermediate progenitors (IPs), produce PN diversity, and hierarchical organization remains unclear. A fundamental issue is whether RGs constitute a homogeneous, multipotent lineage capable of generating all major PN types through a temporally regulated developmental program, or whether RGs comprise multiple transcriptionally heterogenous pools, each fated to generate a subset of PNs. Beyond RGs, the role of IPs in PN diversification remains underexplored. Addressing these questions requires tracking PN developmental trajectories with cell-type resolution - from transcription factor-defined RGs and IPs to their PN progeny, which are defined not only by laminar location but also by projection patterns and gene expression. Advances in cell-type resolution genetic fate mapping, axon tracing, and spatial transcriptomics may provide the technical capability for answering these fundamental questions.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexNeuronsNeurogliaStem CellsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID37148649
PMCPMC10557529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.