ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2023
SOS-independent bacterial DNA damage responses: diverse mechanisms, unifying function.
Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcription activation mechanism of a noncanonical DNA damage response pathway by the WYL-activator, DriD.Science advances · 2026Article
- A WYL transcriptional regulator activates the DNA damage response pathway in Acinetobacter species.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Natural phenolics as multitarget antimicrobials for food preservation: mechanisms of action.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- Systematic modulation of bacterial resource allocation by perturbing RNA polymerase availability via synthetic transcriptional switches.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- DdiA, an XRE family transcriptional regulator, is a co-regulator of the DNA damage response inJournal of bacteriology · 2025Article
- Chlorophyllin-Mediated Photodynamic Inactivation: Dosage and Time Dependency in the Inhibition ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Allosteric activation mechanism of DriD, a WYL-domain containing transcription regulator.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The Emerging Role of (p)ppGpp in DNA Repair and Associated Bacterial Survival against Fluoroquinolones.Gene expression · 2025Article
- Single-stranded DNA binding to the transcription factor PafBC triggers the mycobacterial DNA damage response.Science advances · 2025Article
- Naturally competent bacteria and their genetic parasites-a battle for control over horizontal gene transfer?FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Combined inactivation of the SOS response with TCA fumarases and the adaptive response enhances antibiotic susceptibility againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Low-dose zinc oxide nanoparticles trigger the growth and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a hormetic response.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- SOS-Inducing Drugs Trigger Nucleic Acid Release and Biofilm Formation in Gram-Negative Bacteria.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Widespread prevalence of a methylation-dependent switch to activate an essential DNA damage response in bacteria.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Pleiotropic cellular responses underlying antibiotic tolerance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- DNA Damage Response Mechanisms in Model Systems.Genes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cells across domains of life have dedicated pathways to sense and respond to DNA damage. These responses are broadly termed as DNA damage responses (DDRs). In bacteria, the best studied DDR is the Save our Soul (SOS) response. More recently, several SOS-independent DDRs have also been discovered. Studies further report diversity in the types of repair proteins present across bacterial species as well as differences in their mechanisms of action. Although the primary function of DDRs is preservation of genome integrity, the diverse organization, conservation, and function of bacterial DDRs raises important questions about how genome error correction mechanisms could influence or be influenced by the genomes that encode them. In this review, we discuss recent insights on three SOS-independent bacterial DDRs. We consider open questions in our understanding of how diversity in response and repair mechanisms is generated, and how action of these pathways is regulated in cells to ensure maintenance of genome integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.