Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37148580›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2023

The effect of older age on treatment outcomes in women with advanced ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy: An NRG-Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-0182-ICON5) ancillary study.

Tiffany Y Sia, William P Tew, Christopher Purdy, Dennis S Chi, Andrew W Menzin, John L Lovecchio, Michael A Bookman, David E Cohn, Deanna G Teoh, Michael Friedlander and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00011986 (A Phase III Randomized Trial Of Paclitaxel And Carboplatin Versus Triplet Or Sequential Doublet Combinations In Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00011986 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Randomized Trial Of Paclitaxel And Carboplatin Versus Triplet Or Sequential Doublet Combinations In Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGynecologic Oncology GroupRan2001 to 2013Enrolled4,312ConditionsPrimary Peritoneal Carcinoma, Stage III Ovarian Cancer, Stage IV Ovarian CancerArmsPaclitaxel, Carboplatin, Gemcitabine Hydrochloride, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, Topotecan Hydrochloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Tiffany Y SiaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: siat@mskcc.org.
William P TewMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: teww@mskcc.org.
Christopher PurdyRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: purdyc@nrgoncology.org.
Dennis S ChiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: chid@mskcc.org.
Andrew W MenzinNorth Shore-Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Manhasset, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: amenzin@northwell.edu.
John L LovecchioNorth Shore-Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Manhasset, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: jlovecch@northwell.edu.
Michael A BookmanGynecologic Oncology Therapeutics, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: Michael.A.Bookman@kp.org.
David E CohnOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States of America. Electronic address: David.Cohn@osumc.edu.
Deanna G TeohUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America. Electronic address: dkteoh@umn.edu.
Michael FriedlanderDepartment of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: Michael.Friedlander@health.nsw.gov.au.
David BenderUniversity of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City, IA, United States of America. Electronic address: David-bender@uiowa.edu.
David G MutchWashington University, St. Louis, MO, United States of America. Electronic address: mutchd@wustl.edu.
David M GershensonMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America. Electronic address: dgershen@mdanderson.org.
Krishnansu S TewariUniversity of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: ktewari@hs.uci.edu.
Robert M WenhamMoffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States of America. Electronic address: Robert.wenham@moffitt.org.
Andrea E Wahner HendricksonMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America. Electronic address: WahnerHendrickson.Andrea@mayo.edu.
Roger B LeeTacoma General Hospital, Tacoma, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: rogerblee@aol.com.
Heidi J GrayFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America. Electronic address: hgray@uw.edu.
Angeles Alvarez SecordDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: angeles.secord@duke.edu.
Linda Van LeUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America. Electronic address: linda_van_le@med.unc.edu.
Stuart M LichtmanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America. Electronic address: LichtmaS@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY / SITEMAN CANCER CENTER LEAD ACADEMIC SITEUG1CA233339 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NANCY L BARTLETT, Clifford Grant Robinson · 2019 to 2026
$11.3M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUG1CA233290 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI CAROL AGHAJANIAN, Darren Feldman · 2019 to 2026
$10.2M
UNC Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233373 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CAREY, LISA A, DEES, ELIZABETH CLAIRE · 2019 to 2025
$3.5M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site Grant from the Roswell Park Cancer InstituteUG1CA233191 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI LELE, SHASHIKANT, LEVINE, ELLIS G · 2019 to 2025
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233191NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233290NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233339NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effect of age on overall survival (OS) in women with ovarian cancer receiving chemotherapy. Secondary objectives were to describe the effect of age on treatment compliance, toxicities, progression free survival (PFS), time from surgery to chemotherapy, and rates of optimal cytoreduction.

methodsWomen enrolled in GOG 0182-ICON5 with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who underwent surgery and chemotherapy between 2001 and 2004 were included. Patients were divided into ages <70 and ≥ 70 years. Baseline characteristics, treatment compliance, toxicities, and clinical outcomes were compared.

resultsWe included a total of 3686 patients, with 620 patients (16.8%) ≥ 70 years. OS was 37.2 months in older compared to 45.0 months in younger patients (HR 1.21, 95% CI, 1.09-1.34, p < 0.001). Older patients had an increased risk of cancer-specific-death (HR 1.16, 95% CI, 1.04-1.29) as well as non-cancer related deaths (HR 2.78, 95% CI, 2.00-3.87). Median PFS was 15.1 months in older compared to 16.0 months in younger patients (HR 1.10, 95% CI, 1.00-1.20, p = 0.056). In the carboplatin/paclitaxel arm, older patients were just as likely to complete therapy and more likely to develop grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy (35.7 vs 19.7%, p < 0.001). Risk of other toxicities remained equal between groups.

conclusionsIn women with advanced EOC receiving chemotherapy, age ≥ 70 was associated with shorter OS and cancer specific survival. Older patients receiving carboplatin and paclitaxel reported higher rates of grade ≥ 2 neuropathy but were not more likely to suffer from other chemotherapy related toxicities. Clintrials.gov: NCT00011986.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarboplatinCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingPaclitaxelTreatment OutcomeCarboplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID37148580
PMCPMC10414765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.