Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37148391›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023

A prospective randomised controlled trial evaluating prophylactic Floseal, a gelatin and thrombin-based haemostatic matrix, in postoperative drain output and blood transfusion in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Eugene Pak-Lin Ng, Kam-Lung Tung, Siu-Leung Yip, Michael Siu-Hei Tse, Tik-Koon Kwok, Kam-Kwong Wong

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eugene Pak-Lin NgDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong. epl.ng@ha.org.hk.ORCID 0000-0001-8071-0392
Kam-Lung TungDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Siu-Leung YipDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Michael Siu-Hei TseDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Tik-Koon KwokDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Kam-Kwong WongDepartment of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Kwong Wah Hospital, 25 Waterloo Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Kwong Wah Hospital · CN

Funding

Hospital Authority KW/FR-15-032(83-33)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the prophylactic use of Floseal in reducing postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF). TLIF is a lumbar spine decompression and fusion procedure with potential for postoperative blood loss. Prophylactic application of Floseal, a gelatin and thrombin-based haemostatic matrix to the surgical wound before closure was shown to be effective in reducing postoperative drain output in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. This study postulated that prophylactic use of Floseal before wound closure would reduce postoperative blood loss in patients who underwent TLIF.

methodsRandomised controlled trial comparing prophylactic use of Floseal and control in patients undergoing single level or two-level TLIF. Primary outcomes included postoperative drain output within 24 h and postoperative transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included days of drain placement, length of stay and haemoglobin level.

resultsA total of 50 patients was recruited. Twenty six patients were allocated to the Floseal group and 24 were allocated to the control group. There were no baseline characteristic differences between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in primary outcomes which included postoperative drain output within 24 h and postoperative transfusion rate between patients who received prophylactic Floseal and control. There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes which included haemoglobin level, days of drain placement and length of stay between the two groups.

conclusionProphylactic use of Floseal was not shown to reduce postoperative bleeding in single level or two-level TLIF.

Indexed as

HemostaticsSpinal FusionBlood TransfusionGelatinHemoglobinsHumansLumbar VertebraeMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative HemorrhageProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesThrombinTreatment OutcomeGelatinHemoglobinsHemostaticsThrombinFlosealFusionHaemostasisLumbarTLIF

Identifiers

PMID37148391
OpenAlexW4372355066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.