Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37148371›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2023

Tooth automatic segmentation from CBCT images: a systematic review.

Alessandro Polizzi, Vincenzo Quinzi, Vincenzo Ronsivalle, Pietro Venezia, Simona Santonocito, Antonino Lo Giudice, Rosalia Leonardi, Gaetano Isola

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Study on dental image segmentation and automatic root canal measurement based on multi-stage deep learning using cone beam computed tomography].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alessandro PolizziDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy. alexpoli345@gmail.com.
Vincenzo QuinziDepartment of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, Postgraduate School of Orthodontics, University of L'Aquila, 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
Vincenzo RonsivalleDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy.
Pietro VeneziaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy.
Simona SantonocitoDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy.
Antonino Lo GiudiceDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy.
Rosalia LeonardiDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy.
Gaetano IsolaDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, AOU "Policlinico-San Marco", Via S. Sofia 78, 95124, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the current state of the art regarding technological advances in full-automatic tooth segmentation approaches from 3D cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn March 2023, a search strategy without a timeline setting was carried out through a combination of MeSH terms and free text words pooled through Boolean operators ('AND', 'OR') on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEE Explore. Randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, cohort, case-control, cross-sectional and retrospective studies in the English language only were included.

resultsThe search strategy identified 541 articles, of which 23 have been selected. The most employed segmentation methods were based on deep learning approaches. One article exposed an automatic approach for tooth segmentation based on a watershed algorithm and another article used an improved level set method. Four studies presented classical machine learning and thresholding approaches. The most employed metric for evaluating segmentation performance was the Dice similarity index which ranged from 90 ± 3% to 97.9 ± 1.5%.

conclusionsThresholding appeared not reliable for tooth segmentation from CBCT images, whereas convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been demonstrated as the most promising approach. CNNs could help overcome tooth segmentation's main limitations from CBCT images related to root anatomy, heavy scattering, immature teeth, metal artifacts and time consumption. New studies with uniform protocols and evaluation metrics with random sampling and blinding for data analysis are encouraged to objectively compare the different deep learning architectures' reliability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Automatic tooth segmentation's best performance has been obtained through CNNs for the different ambits of digital dentistry.

Indexed as

Spiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyToothCone-Beam Computed TomographyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAutomaticCBCTDeep learningDigitalTooth segmentation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.