Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37148347›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2023

Knife wound or nosebleed-where does the blood at the crime scene come from?

Helen Konrad, Janina Lawniczek, Christine Bajramjan, Lisa Weber, Thomas Bajanowski, Micaela Poetsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen KonradInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Janina LawniczekInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Christine BajramjanInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Lisa WeberInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Thomas BajanowskiInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
Micaela PoetschInstitute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany. micaela.poetsch@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1364-6487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Secretion analysis is a useful tool in forensic genetics, since it establishes the (cellular) origin of the DNA prior in addition to the identification of the DNA donor. This information can be crucial for the construction of the crime sequence or verification of statements of people involved in the crime. For some secretions, rapid/pretests already exist (blood, semen, urine, and saliva) or can be determined via published methylation analyses or expression analyses (blood, saliva vaginal secretions, menstrual blood, and semen). To discriminate nasal secretion/blood from other secretions (like oral mucosa/saliva, blood, vaginal secretion, menstrual blood, and seminal fluid), assays based on specific methylation patterns at several CpGs were set up in this study. Out of an initial 54 different CpG markers tested, two markers showed a specific methylation value for nasal samples: N21 and N27 with a methylation mean value of 64.4% ± 17.6% and 33.2% ± 8.7%, respectively. Although identification or discrimination was not possible for all nasal samples (due to partial overlap in methylation values to other secretions), 63% and 26% of the nasal samples could be unambiguously identified and distinguished from the other secretions using the CpG marker N21 and N27, respectively. In combination with a blood pretest/rapid test, a third marker (N10) was able to detect nasal cells in 53% of samples. Moreover, the employment of this pretest increases the proportion of identifiable or discriminable nasal secretion samples using marker N27 to 68%. In summary, our CpG assays proved to be promising tools in forensic analysis for the detection of nasal cells in samples from a crime scene.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpistaxisCrimeDNAFemaleForensic GeneticsHumansSalivaSemenDNABody fluid identificationDNA methylationEpigenetic analysisNasal mucosa

Identifiers

PMID37148347
PMCPMC10247842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.