Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37147910›Full record

ReviewZoological research2023

Large animal models of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury: Where are we now?

Attaur Rahman, Yuhao Li, To-Kiu Chan, Hui Zhao, Yaozu Xiang, Xing Chang, Hao Zhou, Dachun Xu, Sang-Bing Ong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zoological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Mechanism of post cardiac arrest syndrome based on animal models of cardiac arrest.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Animal models for transplant immunology: bridging bench to bedside.Clinical transplantation and research · 2024
    Review
  13. Animal Models of Human Disease 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Multicellular 3D models to study myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Attaur RahmanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yuhao LiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China.
To-Kiu ChanDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hui ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CUHK-GIBH CAS Joint Laboratory on Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yaozu XiangShanghai East Hospital, Key Laboratory of Arrhythmias of the Ministry of Education of China, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Xing ChangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Hao ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Dachun XuDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China. E-mail: xdc77@tongji.edu.cn.
Sang-Bing OngDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK), Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large animal models of cardiac ischemia-reperfusion are critical for evaluation of the efficacy of cardioprotective interventions prior to clinical translation. Nonetheless, current cardioprotective strategies/interventions formulated in preclinical cardiovascular research are often limited to small animal models, which are not transferable or reproducible in large animal models due to different factors such as: (i) complex and varied features of human ischemic cardiac disease (ICD), which are challenging to mimic in animal models, (ii) significant differences in surgical techniques applied, and (iii) differences in cardiovascular anatomy and physiology between small versus large animals. This article highlights the advantages and disadvantages of different large animal models of preclinical cardiac ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI), as well as the different methods used to induce and assess IRI, and the obstacles faced in using large animals for translational research in the settings of cardiac IR.

Indexed as

Myocardial Reperfusion InjuryAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansCardiovascular disorderIschemic cardiac diseaseIschemic-reperfusion injuryLarge animal modelMyocardial infarctionTranslational gap

Identifiers

PMID37147910
PMCPMC10236300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.