ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2023
Strategies to improve genomic predictions for 35 duck carcass traits in an F
Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic selection accuracy and bias using imputed genotypes on growth, welfare and fitness traits in two Pekin duck lines.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Genetic parameters estimation and optimization of genomic selection in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain): a case study for growth-related traits.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genomic predictions for growth and feed efficiency traits in a duck breeding population.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association Studies in Japanese Quails of the FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- A meta-analysis of genetic estimates for economically important traits in ducks.Veterinary and animal science · 2024Article
- Article
- Genetic parameters and genomic prediction of growth and breast morphological traits in a crossbreed duck population.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCarcass traits are crucial for broiler ducks, but carcass traits can only be measured postmortem. Genomic selection (GS) is an effective approach in animal breeding to improve selection and reduce costs. However, the performance of genomic prediction in duck carcass traits remains largely unknown.
resultsIn this study, we estimated the genetic parameters, performed GS using different models and marker densities, and compared the estimation performance between GS and conventional BLUP on 35 carcass traits in an F
conclusionThis study demonstrates genomic selection for duck carcass traits is promising. The genomic prediction can be further improved by modifying the genomic relationship matrix using our proposed true variance method and several Bayesian models. Permutation study provides a theoretical basis for the fact that low-density arrays can be used to reduce genotype costs in duck genome selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.