Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37147628›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Ontology-driven and weakly supervised rare disease identification from clinical notes.

Hang Dong, Víctor Suárez-Paniagua, Huayu Zhang, Minhong Wang, Arlene Casey, Emma Davidson, Jiaoyan Chen, Beatrice Alex, William Whiteley, Honghan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A hybrid framework with large language models for rare disease phenotyping.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hang DongCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. hang.dong@cs.ox.ac.uk.
Víctor Suárez-PaniaguaCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Huayu ZhangAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Minhong WangInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Arlene CaseyAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Emma DavidsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jiaoyan ChenDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Beatrice AlexEdinburgh Futures Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
William WhiteleyHealth Data Research UK, London, United Kingdom.
Honghan WuHealth Data Research UK, London, United Kingdom. honghan.wu@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_18029Medical Research Council MR/S004149/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust PIII009, PIII029, PIII032, PIII054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputational text phenotyping is the practice of identifying patients with certain disorders and traits from clinical notes. Rare diseases are challenging to be identified due to few cases available for machine learning and the need for data annotation from domain experts.

methodsWe propose a method using ontologies and weak supervision, with recent pre-trained contextual representations from Bi-directional Transformers (e.g. BERT). The ontology-driven framework includes two steps: (i) Text-to-UMLS, extracting phenotypes by contextually linking mentions to concepts in Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), with a Named Entity Recognition and Linking (NER+L) tool, SemEHR, and weak supervision with customised rules and contextual mention representation; (ii) UMLS-to-ORDO, matching UMLS concepts to rare diseases in Orphanet Rare Disease Ontology (ORDO). The weakly supervised approach is proposed to learn a phenotype confirmation model to improve Text-to-UMLS linking, without annotated data from domain experts. We evaluated the approach on three clinical datasets, MIMIC-III discharge summaries, MIMIC-III radiology reports, and NHS Tayside brain imaging reports from two institutions in the US and the UK, with annotations.

resultsThe improvements in the precision were pronounced (by over 30% to 50% absolute score for Text-to-UMLS linking), with almost no loss of recall compared to the existing NER+L tool, SemEHR. Results on radiology reports from MIMIC-III and NHS Tayside were consistent with the discharge summaries. The overall pipeline processing clinical notes can extract rare disease cases, mostly uncaptured in structured data (manually assigned ICD codes).

conclusionThe study provides empirical evidence for the task by applying a weakly supervised NLP pipeline on clinical notes. The proposed weak supervised deep learning approach requires no human annotation except for validation and testing, by leveraging ontologies, NER+L tools, and contextual representations. The study also demonstrates that Natural Language Processing (NLP) can complement traditional ICD-based approaches to better estimate rare diseases in clinical notes. We discuss the usefulness and limitations of the weak supervision approach and propose directions for future studies.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingRare DiseasesHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMachine LearningUnified Medical Language SystemClinical notesNatural language processingOntology matchingPhenotypingRare diseasesWeak supervision

Identifiers

PMID37147628
PMCPMC10162001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.