Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37147531›Full record

ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2023

[Diagnostics of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid].

Velina Haralanova, Katharina Meier, Uwe Pleyer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Velina HaralanovaKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Katharina MeierKlinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Deutschland.
Uwe PleyerKlinik für Augenheilkunde, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. uwe.pleyer@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) remains a challenge as the timing and choice of diagnostic methods have a decisive influence on its quality. A systematic approach is required that includes a comprehensive medical history, critical evaluation of the clinical findings and targeted laboratory testing. The diagnosis is complicated by the fact that some patients present purely clinically the symptoms of MMP without fulfilling the required immunohistochemical and laboratory criteria. Basically, the diagnosis of ocular MMP is based on three pillars: 1) medical history and clinical findings, 2) positive immunohistological (direct immunofluorescence) tissue sample and 3) specific serological autoantibodies. As the diagnosis of ocular MMP often implies prolonged systemic immunomodulatory treatment in predominantly older patients, the accurate diagnosis and approach are of critical relevance. The aim of this article is to present the recently updated diagnostic procedure.

Indexed as

Pemphigoid, Benign Mucous MembranePemphigoid, BullousAutoantibodiesFluorescent Antibody Technique, DirectHumansMucous MembraneAutoantibodiesAutoantibodiesBiopsyConjunctivaDirect immunofluorescenceLaboratory tests

Identifiers

PMID37147531
OpenAlexW4372279934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.