ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023
Evaluation of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring in routine surgical practice.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ImplementatioN of Remote Surgical wOund Assessment During the coviD-19 pandEmic
Remote Assessment of the Permanent Site After Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation of digital remote postoperative monitoring in routine practice: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Trial
- Smartphone-Based Postoperative Wound Assessment Following Laparoscopic Surgery in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Prospective Cohort Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SurgWound-Bench: a benchmark for surgical wound diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Portable electronic devices for mechanotherapy and operative treatment of osteoarthritis.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2026Review
- Transforming Dental Care Through Empathetic and Clear Communication: A Comprehensive Review and Implementation Framework.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Linking Patient-Reported and Clinician-Assessed Wound Status via Chatbot-Based Digital Surveillance for Wound Infection: Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- Evaluation of the effectiveness of the model of family participatory care based on cloud follow-up in enhancing the quality of life and psychological well-being of patients with chronic difficult-to-heal traumatic tumours.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Artificial intelligence and precision nursing in the operating room: transforming perioperative safety and surgical outcomes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Perioperative nursing process-oriented bundled interventions and digital monitoring for the prevention of surgical site infections.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Digitising wound care: a cost-consequence analysis of the Wound Care Command Centre™ in Australia.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Pioneering sustainable treatment delivery in childhood leukemia through synchronous telemedicine-A pilot study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Multimodal machine learning to predict surgical site infection with healthcare workload impact assessment.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Requirements of Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Preparation for Discharge from the Hospital -A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Enhancing Surgical Wound Monitoring: A Paired Cohort Study Evaluating a New AI-Based Application for Automatic Detection of Potential Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Environmentally sustainable surgical systems.BMJ global health · 2024Review
- Article
- Wound management materials and technologies from bench to bedside and beyond.Nature reviews. Materials · 2024Article
- Biomimetic Materials for Skin Tissue Regeneration and Electronic Skin.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial intelligence in surgery.Nature medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring provides an opportunity to strengthen postoperative community care and minimise the burden of surgical-site infection (SSI). This study aimed to pilot a remote digital postoperative wound monitoring service and evaluate the readiness for implementation in routine clinical practice. This was a single-arm pilot implementational study of remote digital postoperative wound monitoring across two tertiary care hospitals in the UK (IDEAL stage 2b, clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05069103). Adults undergoing abdominal surgery were recruited and received a smartphone-delivered wound assessment tool for 30-days postoperatively. Patients received 30-day postoperative follow-up, including the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ). A thematic mixed-methods approach was used, according to the WHO framework for monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions. 200 patients were enroled, of whom 115 (57.5%) underwent emergency surgical procedures. Overall, the 30-day SSI rate was 16.5% (n = 33/200), with 72.7% (n = 24) diagnosed post-discharge. Usage of the intervention was 83.0% (n = 166/200), with subsequently 74.1% (n = 123/166) TUQ completion. There were no issues reported with feasibility of the technology, with the reliability (3.87, 95% CI: 3.73-4.00) and quality of the interface rated highly (4.18, 95%: 4.06-4.30). Patient acceptance was similarly high with regards to ease of use (4.51, 95% CI: 4.41-4.62), satisfaction (4.27, 95% CI: 4.13-4.41), and usefulness (4.07, 95% CI: 3.92-4.23). Despite the desire for more frequent and personalised interactions, the majority viewed the intervention as providing meaningful benefit over routine postoperative care. Remote digital postoperative wound monitoring successfully demonstrated readiness for implementation with regards to the technology, usability, and healthcare process improvement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.