ArticleScientific reports2023
Impact of cholecystectomy on acute coronary syndrome according to metabolic condition: a nationwide population-based cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The Association between Gallstone Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2025Pooled it
- Association between gallstones and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis: An observational study with propensity score matching.PloS one · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gallbladder stones (GS) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between cholecystectomy for GS and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unknown. We investigated the ACS risk in patients with GS and its association with cholecystectomy. Data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort from 2002 to 2013 was extracted. Overall, 64,370 individuals were selected through a 1:3 propensity score matching. Patients were stratified into two groups for comparison: the gallstone group, GS patients with or without cholecystectomy; and the control group, patients without GS or cholecystectomy. The gallstone group exhibited a higher risk of ACS than the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.47; P < 0.0001). In the gallstone group, individuals without cholecystectomy had a higher risk of ACS development (HR: 1.35, 95% CI 1.17-1.55, P < 0.0001). Patients with GS with diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia, had a higher risk of developing ACS than GS patients without the metabolic diseases (HR: 1.29, P < 0.001). The risk did not significantly differ after cholecystectomy compared to those without GS (HR: 1.15, P = 0.1924), but without cholecystectomy, the risk of ACS development was significantly higher than control group (1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.50, P = 0.0004). Among patients without above metabolic disorders, cholecystectomy was still associated with increased ACS risk in the gallstone group (HR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.27-6.76, P = 0.0116). GS increased the risk of ACS. The effect of cholecystectomy on ACS risk differs according to the presence or absence of metabolic disorders. Thus, the decision to perform cholecystectomy for GS should consider both the ACS risk and the underlying disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.