ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2023
Electroretinographic Responses in Retinopathy of Prematurity Treated Using Intravitreal Bevacizumab or Laser.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nine-year ocular developmental outcomes after ranibizumab or laser treatment for zone II retinopathy of prematurity: follow-up of a randomized trial cohort.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Beyond Neovascularization: Light Response Deficits in Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy Models.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Review
- Comprehensive multiomics analyses identify guanylate cyclase activator 1A as a photoreceptor-specific target in a murine model of oxygen-induced retinopathy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- HBS1L deficiency causes retinal dystrophy in a child and in a mouse model associated with defective development of photoreceptor cells.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024Article
- A promising case of preclinical-clinical translation: β-adrenoceptor blockade from the oxygen-induced retinopathy model to retinopathy of prematurity.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIntravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) offers advantages over laser photoablation for treatment of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). However, retinal function has not, to date, been quantitatively compared following these interventions. Therefore, electroretinography (ERG) was used compare retinal function among eyes treated using IVB or laser, and control eyes. In addition, among the IVB-treated eyes, ERG was used to compare function in individuals in whom subsequent laser was and was not required.
designProspective clinical cohort study.
methodsERG was used to record dark- and light-adapted stimulus/response functions in 21 children treated using IVB (12 of whom required subsequent laser in at least 1 eye for persistent avascular retina [PAR]). Sensitivity and amplitude parameters were derived from the a-wave, b-wave, and oscillatory potentials (OPs), representing activity in photoreceptor, postreceptor, and inner retinal cells, respectively. These parameters were then referenced to those of 76 healthy, term-born controls and compared to those of 10 children treated using laser only.
resultsIn children with treated ROP, every ERG parameter was significantly below the mean in controls. However, these significant ERG deficits did not differ between IVB- and laser-treated eyes. Among children treated using IVB, no ERG parameter was significantly associated with dose or need for subsequent laser.
conclusionRetinal function was significantly impaired in treated ROP eyes. Function in IVB-treated eyes did not differ from that in laser-treated eyes. Functional differences also did not distinguish those IVB-treated eyes that would subsequently need laser for PAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.