Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37146265›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2023

Integrative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research: Workflow Automation for Neuro-Oncology (I3CR-WANO).

Satrajit Chakrabarty, Syed Amaan Abidi, Mina Mousa, Mahati Mokkarala, Isabelle Hren, Divya Yadav, Matthew Kelsey, Pamela LaMontagne, John Wood, Michael Adams and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Satrajit ChakrabartyDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-9664-4470
Syed Amaan AbidiMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Mina MousaMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0001-8619-9740
Mahati MokkaralaMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-6636-0434
Isabelle HrenDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-2608-8058
Divya YadavDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Matthew KelseyMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Pamela LaMontagneMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-6752-8518
John WoodDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-7735
Michael AdamsDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Yuzhuo SuDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0009-0009-4574-0081
Sherry ThorpeDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Caroline ChungDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-9662-1519
Aristeidis SotirasMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-0795-8820
Daniel S MarcusMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-5358

Funding

Sustaining the Integrative Imaging Informatics for Cancer Research (I3CR) CenterU24CA258483 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Daniel Scott Marcus · 2021 to 2026
$4.4M
INTEGRATIVE IMAGING INFORMATICS FOR CANCER RESEARCHU24CA204854 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT, WAHL, RICHARD LEO · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
NINDS CENTER CORE FOR BRAIN IMAGINGP30NS098577 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HERSHEY, TAMARA G, MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA204854NCI NIH HHS U24 CA258483NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS098577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEfforts to use growing volumes of clinical imaging data to generate tumor evaluations continue to require significant manual data wrangling, owing to data heterogeneity. Here, we propose an artificial intelligence-based solution for the aggregation and processing of multisequence neuro-oncology MRI data to extract quantitative tumor measurements. MATERIALS AND

methodsOur end-to-end framework (1) classifies MRI sequences using an ensemble classifier, (2) preprocesses the data in a reproducible manner, (3) delineates tumor tissue subtypes using convolutional neural networks, and (4) extracts diverse radiomic features. Moreover, it is robust to missing sequences and adopts an expert-in-the-loop approach in which the segmentation results may be manually refined by radiologists. After the implementation of the framework in Docker containers, it was applied to two retrospective glioma data sets collected from the Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM; n = 384) and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDA; n = 30), comprising preoperative MRI scans from patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas.

resultsThe scan-type classifier yielded an accuracy of >99%, correctly identifying sequences from 380 of 384 and 30 of 30 sessions from the WUSM and MDA data sets, respectively. Segmentation performance was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient between the predicted and expert-refined tumor masks. The mean Dice scores were 0.882 (±0.244) and 0.977 (±0.04) for whole-tumor segmentation for WUSM and MDA, respectively.

conclusionThis streamlined framework automatically curated, processed, and segmented raw MRI data of patients with varying grades of gliomas, enabling the curation of large-scale neuro-oncology data sets and demonstrating high potential for integration as an assistive tool in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGliomaAutomationHumansRetrospective StudiesWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID37146265
PMCPMC10281444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.