Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37146219›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2023

Interventions from pregnancy to two years after birth for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder and/or with childhood experience of maltreatment.

Kimberley A Jones, Isabella Freijah, Sue E Brennan, Joanne E McKenzie, Tess M Bright, Renee Fiolet, Ilias Kamitsis, Carol Reid, Elise Davis, Shawana Andrews and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Kimberley A JonesIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Isabella FreijahIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Sue E BrennanSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Joanne E McKenzieSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Tess M BrightIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Renee FioletIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Ilias KamitsisIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Carol ReidJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Elise DavisIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Shawana AndrewsPoche Centre for Indigenous Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Maria MuzikDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Leonie SegalHealth Economics and Social Policy, Australian Centre for Precision Health, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Australia.
Helen HerrmanOrygen, National Centre of Excellenece in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Catherine ChamberlainIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
University of Melbourne · AUMelbourne Health · AULa Trobe University · AUMonash University · AUOrygen Youth Health · AUUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcceptable, effective and feasible support strategies (interventions) for parents experiencing complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) symptoms or with a history of childhood maltreatment may offer an opportunity to support parental recovery, reduce the risk of intergenerational transmission of trauma and improve life-course trajectories for children and future generations. However, evidence relating to the effect of interventions has not been synthesised to provide a comprehensive review of available support strategies. This evidence synthesis is critical to inform further research, practice and policy approaches in this emerging area.

objectivesTo assess the effects of interventions provided to support parents who were experiencing CPTSD symptoms or who had experienced childhood maltreatment (or both), on parenting capacity and parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing. SEARCH

methodsIn October 2021 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases and two trials registers, together with checking references and contacting experts to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: All variants of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any intervention delivered in the perinatal period designed to support parents experiencing CPTSD symptoms or with a history of childhood maltreatment (or both), to any active or inactive control. Primary outcomes were parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing and parenting capacity between pregnancy and up to two years postpartum. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials for inclusion, extracted data using a pre-designed data extraction form, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence. We contacted study authors for additional information as required. We analysed continuous data using mean difference (MD) for outcomes using a single measure, and standardised mean difference (SMD) for outcomes using multiple measures, and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data. All data are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We undertook meta-analyses using random-effects models. MAIN

resultsWe included evidence from 1925 participants in 15 RCTs that investigated the effect of 17 interventions. All included studies were published after 2005. Interventions included seven parenting interventions, eight psychological interventions and two service system approaches. The studies were funded by major research councils, government departments and philanthropic/charitable organisations. All evidence was of low or very low certainty. Parenting interventions Evidence was very uncertain from a study (33 participants) assessing the effects of a parenting intervention compared to attention control on trauma-related symptoms, and psychological wellbeing symptoms (postpartum depression), in mothers who had experienced childhood maltreatment and were experiencing current parenting risk factors. Evidence suggested that parenting interventions may improve parent-child relationships slightly compared to usual service provision (SMD 0.45, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.96; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is currently a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to improve parenting capacity or parental psychological or socio-emotional wellbeing in parents experiencing CPTSD symptoms or who have experienced childhood maltreatment (or both). This lack of methodological rigour and high risk of bias made it difficult to interpret the findings of this review. Overall, results suggest that parenting interventions may slightly improve parent-child relationships but have a small, unimportant effect on parenting skills. Psychological interventions may help some women stop smoking in pregnancy, and may have small benefits on parents' relationships and parenting skills. A financial empowerment programme may slightly worsen depression symptoms. While potential beneficial effects were small, the importance of a positive effect in a small number of parents must be considered when making treatment and care decisions. There is a need for further high-quality research into effective strategies for this population.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticFemaleHumansMothersParentsPregnancyPregnant PeoplePsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37146219
PMCPMC10162699
OpenAlexW4368372206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.