Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37146204›Full record

ArticleBJS open2023

Pulmonary metastasectomy and repeat metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: outcomes from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery.

Martijn van Dorp, Nienke Wolfhagen, Bart Torensma, Chris Dickhoff, Geert Kazemier, David J Heineman, Wilhelmina H Schreurs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Outcomes and prognostic factors of repeat pulmonary metastasectomy.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Martijn van DorpDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3760-3027
Nienke WolfhagenDutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bart TorensmaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Chris DickhoffDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert KazemierDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David J HeinemanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilhelmina H SchreursDepartment of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing · NLLeiden University · NLNorthwest Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical resection of recurrent pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer is an established treatment option; however, the evidence for repeat resection is limited. The aim of this study was to analyse long-term outcomes from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery.

methodsData from the mandatory Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery were used to analyse all patients after metastasectomy or repeat metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Netherlands. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine the difference in survival. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival.

resultsA total of 1237 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 127 patients underwent repeat metastasectomy. Five-year overall survival was 53 per cent after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases and 52 per cent after repeat metastasectomy (P = 0.852). The median follow-up was 42 (range 0-285) months. More patients experienced postoperative complications after repeat metastasectomy compared with the first metastasectomy (18.1 per cent versus 11.6 per cent respectively; P = 0.033). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 1 (HR 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.08 to 1.65; P = 0.008), multiple metastases (HR 1.30, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.67; P = 0.038), and bilateral metastases (HR 1.50, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 2.22; P = 0.045) were prognostic factors on multivariable analysis for pulmonary metastasectomy. Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide less than 80 per cent (HR 1.04, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.06; P = 0.004) was the only prognostic factor on multivariable analysis for repeat metastasectomy.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases have comparable median and 5-year overall survival rates after primary or recurrent pulmonary metastasectomy. However, repeat metastasectomy has a higher risk of postoperative complications.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsMetastasectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID37146204
PMCPMC10162679
OpenAlexW4372336386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.