ArticlePloS one2023
An improved golden jackal optimization for multilevel thresholding image segmentation.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aerial image segmentation using multilevel thresholding based on multi strategy Osprey optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An improved weighted average algorithm with Cloud-Based Risk-Conscious stochastic model for building energy optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Q-learning improved golden jackal optimization algorithm and its application to reliability optimization of hydraulic system.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- CGJO: a novel complex-valued encoding golden jackal optimization.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction of in-hospital mortality risk for patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction after primary PCI based on predictors selected by GRACE score and two feature selection methods.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aerial photography is a long-range, non-contact method of target detection technology that enables qualitative or quantitative analysis of the target. However, aerial photography images generally have certain chromatic aberration and color distortion. Therefore, effective segmentation of aerial images can further enhance the feature information and reduce the computational difficulty for subsequent image processing. In this paper, we propose an improved version of Golden Jackal Optimization, which is dubbed Helper Mechanism Based Golden Jackal Optimization (HGJO), to apply multilevel threshold segmentation to aerial images. The proposed method uses opposition-based learning to boost population diversity. And a new approach to calculate the prey escape energy is proposed to improve the convergence speed of the algorithm. In addition, the Cauchy distribution is introduced to adjust the original update scheme to enhance the exploration capability of the algorithm. Finally, a novel "helper mechanism" is designed to improve the performance for escape the local optima. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, we use the CEC2022 benchmark function test suite to perform comparison experiments. the HGJO is compared with the original GJO and five classical meta-heuristics. The experimental results show that HGJO is able to achieve competitive results in the benchmark test set. Finally, all of the algorithms are applied to the experiments of variable threshold segmentation of aerial images, and the results show that the aerial photography images segmented by HGJO beat the others. Noteworthy, the source code of HGJO is publicly available at https://github.com/Vang-z/HGJO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.