Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37145996›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.

Heang-Ping Chan, Mark A Helvie, Mingjie Gao, Lubomir Hadjiiski, Chuan Zhou, Kim Garver, Katherine A Klein, Carol McLaughlin, Rebecca Oudsema, W Tania Rahman and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heang-Ping ChanDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Mark A HelvieDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Mingjie GaoDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Lubomir HadjiiskiDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Chuan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kim GarverDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Katherine A KleinDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Carol McLaughlinDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Rebecca OudsemaDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
W Tania RahmanDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Marilyn A RoubidouxDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Improvement of microcalcification detection in digital breast tomosynthesisR01CA151443 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHAN, HEANG-PING · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Advanced breast tomosynthesis reconstruction for improved cancer diagnosisR01CA214981 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHAN, HEANG-PING, FESSLER, JEFFREY A · 2018 to 2022
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151443NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214981NIH HHS RO1 CA214981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe noise in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) includes x-ray quantum noise and detector readout noise. The total radiation dose of a DBT scan is kept at about the level of a digital mammogram but the detector noise is increased due to acquisition of multiple projections. The high noise can degrade the detectability of subtle lesions, specifically microcalcifications (MCs). PURPOSE: We previously developed a deep-learning-based denoiser to improve the image quality of DBT. In the current study, we conducted an observer performance study with breast radiologists to investigate the feasibility of using deep-learning-based denoising to improve the detection of MCs in DBT.

methodsWe have a modular breast phantom set containing seven 1-cm-thick heterogeneous 50% adipose/50% fibroglandular slabs custom-made by CIRS, Inc. (Norfolk, VA). We made six 5-cm-thick breast phantoms embedded with 144 simulated MC clusters of four nominal speck sizes (0.125-0.150, 0.150-0.180, 0.180-0.212, 0.212-0.250 mm) at random locations. The phantoms were imaged with a GE Pristina DBT system using the automatic standard (STD) mode. The phantoms were also imaged with the STD+ mode that increased the average glandular dose by 54% to be used as a reference condition for comparison of radiologists' reading. Our previously trained and validated denoiser was deployed to the STD images to obtain a denoised DBT set (dnSTD). Seven breast radiologists participated as readers to detect the MCs in the DBT volumes of the six phantoms under the three conditions (STD, STD+, dnSTD), totaling 18 DBT volumes. Each radiologist read all the 18 DBT volumes sequentially, which were arranged in a different order for each reader in a counter-balanced manner to minimize any potential reading order effects. They marked the location of each detected MC cluster and provided a conspicuity rating and their confidence level for the perceived cluster. The visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis was used to compare the conspicuity ratings and the confidence levels of the radiologists for the detection of MCs.

resultsThe average sensitivities over all MC speck sizes were 65.3%, 73.2%, and 72.3%, respectively, for the radiologists reading the STD, dnSTD, and STD+ volumes. The sensitivity for dnSTD was significantly higher than that for STD (p < 0.005, two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test) and comparable to that for STD+. The average false positive rates were 3.9 ± 4.6, 2.8 ± 3.7, and 2.7 ± 3.9 marks per DBT volume, respectively, for reading the STD, dnSTD, and STD+ images but the difference between dnSTD and STD or STD+ did not reach statistical significance. The overall conspicuity ratings and confidence levels by VGC analysis for dnSTD were significantly higher than those for both STD and STD+ (p ≤ 0.001). The critical alpha value for significance was adjusted to be 0.025 with Bonferroni correction.

conclusionsThis observer study using breast phantom images showed that deep-learning-based denoising has the potential to improve the detection of MCs in noisy DBT images and increase radiologists' confidence in differentiating noise from MCs without increasing radiation dose. Further studies are needed to evaluate the generalizability of these results to the wide range of DBTs from human subjects and patient populations in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Breast DiseasesCalcinosisMammographyBreastDeep LearningFemaleHumansPhantoms, Imagingdeep learning denoisingdigital breast tomosynthesismicrocalcificationsobserver study

Identifiers

PMID37145996
PMCPMC10592580
OpenAlexW4372337043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.