Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37145993›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Optimizing next-generation RSV prevention in Mali: A cost-effectiveness analysis of pediatric vaccination, maternal vaccination, and extended half-life monoclonal antibody immunoprophylaxis.

Rachel S Laufer, Ranju Baral, Andrea G Buchwald, James D Campbell, Flanon Coulibaly, Fatoumata Diallo, Moussa Doumbia, Amanda J Driscoll, Alison P Galvani, Adama M Keita and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Monoclonal antibody applications in travel medicine.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel S LauferCenter for Vaccine Development & Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3142-9347
Ranju BaralPATH, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-6070
Andrea G BuchwaldCenter for Vaccine Development & Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-6459
James D CampbellDepartment of Pediatrics, Center for Vaccine Development & Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2931-9643
Flanon CoulibalyCentre pour le Développement des Vaccins, Ministère de la Santé, Bamako, Mali.
Fatoumata DialloCentre pour le Développement des Vaccins, Ministère de la Santé, Bamako, Mali.
Moussa DoumbiaCentre pour le Développement des Vaccins, Ministère de la Santé, Bamako, Mali.
Amanda J DriscollCenter for Vaccine Development & Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1385-960X
Alison P GalvaniCenter for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Adama M KeitaCentre pour le Développement des Vaccins, Ministère de la Santé, Bamako, Mali.
Kathleen M NeuzilCenter for Vaccine Development & Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Samba SowCentre pour le Développement des Vaccins, Ministère de la Santé, Bamako, Mali.
Clint PecenkaPATH, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Justin R OrtizCenter for Vaccine Development & Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3138-5965
Meagan C FitzpatrickCenter for Vaccine Development & Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-2668
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USCentre Pour le Développement des Vaccins-Mali · MLProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USYale University · US

Funding

FELLOWSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM IN VACCINOLOGYT32AI007524 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Marcelo B. Sztein · 1997 to 2026
$6.4M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007524
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of early childhood lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Maternal vaccines, birth-dose extended half-life monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and pediatric vaccines are under development for prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in young children. We analyzed the health and economic impact of RSV interventions used alone or in combinations in Mali. We modeled age-specific and season-specific risks of RSV LRTI in children through three years, using WHO Preferred Product Characteristics and data generated in Mali. Health outcomes included RSV LRTI cases, hospitalizations, deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). We identified the optimal combination of products across a range of scenarios. We found that mAb delivered at birth could avert 878 DALYs per birth cohort at an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $597 per DALY averted compared to no intervention if the product were available at $1 per dose. Combining mAb with pediatric vaccine administered at 10/14 weeks, 1947 DALYs would be prevented. The ICER of this combination strategy is $1514 per DALY averted compared to mAb alone. Incorporating parameter uncertainty, mAb alone is likely to be optimal from the societal perspective at efficacy against RSV LRTI above 66%. The optimal strategy was sensitive to economic considerations, including product prices and willingness-to-pay for DALYs. For example, the combination of mAb and pediatric vaccine would be optimal from the government perspective at a willingness-to-pay above $775 per DALY. Maternal vaccine alone or in combination with other interventions was never the optimal strategy, even for high vaccine efficacy. The same was true for pediatric vaccine administered at 6/7 months. At prices comparable to existing vaccine products, extended half-life RSV mAbs would be impactful and efficient components of prevention strategies in LMICs such as Mali.

Identifiers

PMID37145993
PMCPMC10162555
OpenAlexW4372335434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.