ArticleJAMA network open2023
Machine Learning-Based Prognostic Model for Patients After Lung Transplantation.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Use of Machine Learning for Analyzing Real-World Data in Disease Prediction and Management: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- The utility of machine learning for predicting donor non-use in lung transplantation.JHLT open · 2026Article
- An integrated multiomic single-vesicle atlas delineates graft exosome heterogeneity in chronic lung allograft dysfunction.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in heart and lung transplantation.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation: A Temporal Classification and Machine Learning Clustering.Transplantation direct · 2026Article
- GCE: A Framework for Interpretable Nonlinear Hazard Modeling in Cardiac Sarcoma Survival Using SEER Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning and traditional regression approaches to predict risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Observational
- Lung transplantation in 2025: a narrative review of progress, challenges, and the road ahead.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Early identification of high-risk individuals for mortality after lung transplantation: A retrospective cohort study with topological feature engineering.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Association between intraoperative fluid volume and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing lung transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model predicts postoperative complications after thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor surgery: a multicenter study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Risk-dependent conditional survival analysis and annual hazard rate of primary ocular adnexal lymphoma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Intratumoural and Peritumoural Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Models for the Postoperative Survival Prediction in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Transforming lung transplantation with artificial intelligence: a narrative review from organ allocation to post-transplant management.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Machine learning-driven dynamic prognosis for primary colorectal lymphoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An interpretable deep learning framework based on TabNet-Cox for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Risk factors associated with overall survival in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective cohort study in Western China comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional hazards models.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning-Based Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in BCLC Stage 0-B Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Low HALP Score.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Grade 3 Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Lactate-to-albumin ratio improves prediction of perioperative mortality in lung transplant patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Although numerous prognostic factors have been found for patients after lung transplantation (LTx) over the years, an accurate prognostic tool for LTx recipients remains unavailable. Objective: To develop and validate a prognostic model for predicting overall survival in patients after LTx using random survival forests (RSF), a machine learning algorithm. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective prognostic study included patients who underwent LTx between January 2017 and December 2020. The LTx recipients were randomly assigned to training and test sets in accordance with a ratio of 7:3. Feature selection was performed using variable importance with bootstrapping resampling. The prognostic model was fitted using the RSF algorithm, and a Cox regression model was set as a benchmark. The integrated area under the curve (iAUC) and integrated Brier score (iBS) were applied to assess model performance in the test set. Data were analyzed from January 2017 to December 2019. Main Outcomes And Measures: Overall survival in patients after LTx. Results: A total of 504 patients were eligible for this study, consisting of 353 patients in the training set (mean [SD] age, 55.03 [12.78] years; 235 [66.6%] male patients) and 151 patients in the test set (mean [SD] age, 56.79 [10.95] years; 99 [65.6%] male patients). According to the variable importance of each factor, 16 were selected for the final RSF model, and postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation time was identified as the most valuable factor. The RSF model had excellent performance with an iAUC of 0.879 (95% CI, 0.832-0.921) and an iBS of 0.130 (95% CI, 0.106-0.154). The Cox regression model fitted by the same modeling factors to the RSF model was significantly inferior to the RSF model with an iAUC of 0.658 (95% CI, 0.572-0.747; P < .001) and an iBS of 0.205 (95% CI, 0.176-0.233; P < .001). According to the RSF model predictions, the patients after LTx were stratified into 2 prognostic groups displaying significant difference, with mean overall survival of 52.91 months (95% CI, 48.51-57.32) and 14.83 months (95% CI, 9.44-20.22; log-rank P < .001), respectively. Conclusions and relevance: In this prognostic study, the findings first demonstrated that RSF could provide more accurate overall survival prediction and remarkable prognostic stratification than the Cox regression model for patients after LTx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.