Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37145593›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Trends in Resources for Neonatal Intensive Care at Delivery Hospitals for Infants Born Younger Than 30 Weeks' Gestation, 2009-2020.

Nansi S Boghossian, Marco Geraci, Ciaran S Phibbs, Scott A Lorch, Erika M Edwards, Jeffrey D Horbar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01825499 (Vermont Oxford Network Very Low Birth Weight Database of Infants <=1500 Grams or <=29 Weeks Gestational Age at Birth), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01825499 recruitingnot on this map

Vermont Oxford Network Very Low Birth Weight Database of Infants <=1500 Grams or <=29 Weeks Gestational Age at Birth

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorVermont Oxford NetworkRan1990 to 2040Enrolled60,000ConditionsNeonatologyArmsRegistry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Level III neonatal intensive care unit heterogeneity in patients, services, and outcomes.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Birth certificate data substantially misrepresent actual NICU admissions, including among most vulnerable.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Trends in admissions and costs for neonatal intensive care in US children's hospitals, 2017-2022.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Variation in NICU utilization: a narrative review and path forward.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Accurate prediction of neurologic changes in critically ill infants using pose AI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nansi S BoghossianDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Marco GeraciMEMOTEF Department, School of Economics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ciaran S PhibbsHealth Economics Resource Center and Center for Implementation to Innovation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California.
Scott A LorchDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Erika M EdwardsVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, Vermont.
Jeffrey D HorbarVermont Oxford Network, Burlington, Vermont.

Funding

Hospital quality, Medicaid expansion, and racial/ethnic disparitiesin maternal mortality and morbidityR01MD016012 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BOGHOSSIAN, NANSI · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Racial/ethnic disparities in care practices, outcomes, and hospital transfer among infants born at 22-29 weeks gestationR03HD097305 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI BOGHOSSIAN, NANSI · 2019 to 2020
$149k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD097305NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD016012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In an ideal regionalized system, all infants born very preterm would be delivered at a large tertiary hospital capable of providing all necessary care. Objective: To examine whether the distribution of extremely preterm births changed between 2009 and 2020 based on neonatal intensive care resources at the delivery hospital. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 822 Vermont Oxford Network (VON) centers in the US between 2009 and 2020. Participants included infants born at 22 to 29 weeks' gestation, delivered at or transferred to centers participating in the VON. Data were analyzed from February to December 2022. Exposures: Hospital of birth at 22 to 29 weeks' gestation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Birthplace neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) level was classified as A, restriction on assisted ventilation or no surgery; B, major surgery; or C, cardiac surgery requiring bypass. Level B centers were further divided into low-volume (<50 inborn infants at 22 to 29 weeks' gestation per year) and high-volume (≥50 inborn infants at 22 to 29 weeks' gestation per year) centers. High-volume level B and level C centers were combined, resulting in 3 distinct NICU categories: level A, low-volume B, and high-volume B and C NICUs. The main outcome was the change in the percentage of births at hospitals with level A, low-volume B, and high-volume B or C NICUs overall and by US Census region. Results: A total of 357 181 infants (mean [SD] gestational age, 26.4 [2.1] weeks; 188 761 [52.9%] male) were included in the analysis. Across regions, the Pacific (20 239 births [38.3%]) had the lowest while the South Atlantic (48 348 births [62.7%]) had the highest percentage of births at a hospital with a high-volume B- or C-level NICU. Births at hospitals with A-level NICUs increased by 5.6% (95% CI, 4.3% to 7.0%), and births at low-volume B-level NICUs increased by 3.6% (95% CI, 2.1% to 5.0%), while births at hospitals with high-volume B- or C-level NICUs decreased by 9.2% (95% CI, -10.3% to -8.1%). By 2020, less than half of the births for infants at 22 to 29 weeks' gestation occurred at hospitals with high-volume B- or C-level NICUs. Most US Census regions followed the nationwide trends; for example, births at hospitals with high-volume B- or C-level NICUs decreased by 10.9% [95% CI, -14.0% to -7.8%) in the East North Central region and by 21.1% (95% CI, -24.0% to -18.2%) in the West South Central region. Conclusions and Relevance: This retrospective cohort study identified concerning deregionalization trends in birthplace hospital level of care for infants born at 22 to 29 weeks' gestation. These findings should serve to encourage policy makers to identify and enforce strategies to ensure that infants at the highest risk of adverse outcomes are born at the hospitals where they have the best chances to attain optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

Intensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalAdultFemaleGestational AgeHospitalsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37145593
PMCPMC10163386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.