ArticleThe ultrasound journal2023
Intra-and inter-observer variability of point of care ultrasound measurements to evaluate hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the change in carotid corrected flow time and stroke volume variation for assessing volume responsiveness in general anesthesia patients: a prospective, observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Observational
- Females exhibit greater cardiac volume reductions with expiratory muscle loading during submaximal exercise compared to males.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Repeatability and reliability of left ventricular focused cardiac ultrasound parameters in dogs obtained and measured by two non-cardiologist clinicians.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2026Article
- Point-of-care-ultrasound measurements of cardiovascular indices across awake, sedated, anesthetized, and recovered states in dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Analysis of intra- and inter-observer variability in 4D liver ultrasound landmark labeling.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Aorto-Septal Angle Post-Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair through Segmentation and the Semi-Automatic Analysis of Cardiosynchronized Computed Tomography Angiography Images.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Article
- A genetically small fetus impairs placental adaptations near term.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024Article
- Reliability and reproducibility of the venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score, a multi-site prospective study: validating a novel ultrasound technique for comprehensive assessment of venous congestion.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Multi-modality imaging for assessment of the microcirculation in peripheral artery disease: Bench to clinical practice.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Inspiratory-expiratory variation of pleural line thickness in neonates with and without acute respiratory failure.Respiratory research · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool for assessing the hemodynamic status of acute patients. Even though POCUS often uses a qualitative approach, quantitative measurements have potential advantages in evaluating hemodynamic status. Several quantitative ultrasound parameters can be used to assess the hemodynamic status and cardiac function. However, only limited data on the feasibility and reliability of the quantitative hemodynamic measurements in the point-of-care setting are available. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer variability of PoCUS measurements of quantitative hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers.
methodsIn this prospective observational study, three sonographers performed three repeated measurements of eight different hemodynamic parameters in healthy subjects. An expert panel of two experienced sonographers evaluated the images' quality. The repeatability (intra-observer variability) was determined by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) between the separate measurements for each observer. The reproducibility (inter-observer variability) was assessed by determining the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
results32 subjects were included in this study, on whom, in total, 1502 images were obtained for analysis. All parameters were in a normal physiological range. Stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and inferior vena cava diameter (IVC-D) showed high repeatability (CV under 10%) and substantial reproducibility (ICC 0.61-0.80). The other parameters had only moderate repeatability and reproducibility.
conclusionsWe demonstrated good inter-observer reproducibility and good intra-observer repeatability for CO, SV and IVC-D taken in healthy subjects by emergency care physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.