Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37145390›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2023

Intra-and inter-observer variability of point of care ultrasound measurements to evaluate hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers.

Deborah Blanca, Esther C Schwarz, Tycho Joan Olgers, Ewoud Ter Avest, Nasim Azizi, Hjalmar R Bouma, Jan Cornelis Ter Maaten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deborah BlancaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. d.blanca@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3754-4445
Esther C SchwarzDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tycho Joan OlgersDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ewoud Ter AvestDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Nasim AziziDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hjalmar R BoumaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jan Cornelis Ter MaatenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool for assessing the hemodynamic status of acute patients. Even though POCUS often uses a qualitative approach, quantitative measurements have potential advantages in evaluating hemodynamic status. Several quantitative ultrasound parameters can be used to assess the hemodynamic status and cardiac function. However, only limited data on the feasibility and reliability of the quantitative hemodynamic measurements in the point-of-care setting are available. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer variability of PoCUS measurements of quantitative hemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, three sonographers performed three repeated measurements of eight different hemodynamic parameters in healthy subjects. An expert panel of two experienced sonographers evaluated the images' quality. The repeatability (intra-observer variability) was determined by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) between the separate measurements for each observer. The reproducibility (inter-observer variability) was assessed by determining the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

results32 subjects were included in this study, on whom, in total, 1502 images were obtained for analysis. All parameters were in a normal physiological range. Stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and inferior vena cava diameter (IVC-D) showed high repeatability (CV under 10%) and substantial reproducibility (ICC 0.61-0.80). The other parameters had only moderate repeatability and reproducibility.

conclusionsWe demonstrated good inter-observer reproducibility and good intra-observer repeatability for CO, SV and IVC-D taken in healthy subjects by emergency care physicians.

Indexed as

Acute careInter-observer reliabilityIntra-observer variabilityPoint of care ultrasoundRepeatabilityReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID37145390
PMCPMC10163179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.