ArticleAnnals of hematology2023
CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) regimen for core binding factor acute myeloid leukaemia with measurable residual disease.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venetoclax, azacitidine, and G-CSF targeting molecular residual disease in CBFB::MYH11 AML resistant to high-dose cytarabine.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- [Efficacy and safety of venetoclax-cytarabine-homoharringtonine-based cytoreductive therapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1::RUNX1T1: a retrospective study].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Case report: Combination therapy with selinexor, decitabine and half-dose CAG regimen for relapsed elderly acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with t (8;21) or inv (16), called core binding factor (CBF) AML, has a favourable prognosis. However, some CBF-AML patients have persistent measurable residual disease (MRD) and are more likely to relapse after standard chemotherapy treatment. The CAG regimen, composed of cytarabine, aclarubicin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, has been proven to be effective and safe in treating refractory AML patients. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of the CAG regimen to eliminate MRD detected by RUNX1::RUNX1T1 and CBFβ::MYH11 transcript levels by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) among 23 patients. Molecular response was defined as the ratio of fusion transcript after treatment to that before treatment less than or equal to 0.5. The molecular response rate and median decrease ratio of fusion transcripts at the molecular level of the CAG regimen were 52% and 0.53, respectively. The median fusion transcripts before CAG treatment was 0.25% whereas after CAG was 0.11%. Among the 15 patients who had a poor molecular response to the high/intermediate-dose cytarabine regimen, the median decrease ratios of transcripts at the molecular level of high/intermediate-dose cytarabine and CAG were 1.55 and 0.53 (P = 0.028), respectively, and 6 of 15 patients achieved a molecular response to CAG (40%). The median disease-free survival was 18 months, and the overall survival rate at 3 years among all patients was 72.7% ± 10.7%. The common grades 3-4 adverse events were nausea (100%), thrombocytopenia (39%) and neutropenia (37.5%). The CAG regimen may have activity in CBF-AML patients and could provide a new option for patients who have a poor molecular response to high/intermediate-dose cytarabine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.