SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2023
Surgical Interventions for Congenital Ptosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14 Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral types of surgeries have been used in the treatment of congenital ptosis, but the optimal methods and materials for this treatment are unknown. PURPOSE: The study aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of various surgical methods and materials for treatment of congenital ptosis.
methodsWe performed comprehensive searches of five databases, two clinical trial registries and one gray literature database from inception to January 2022 for related trials to include in this study. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of surgical methods and materials on the primary outcomes: margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1), palpebral fissure height (PFH), and degree of lagophthalmos; and secondary outcomes: undercorrection, entropion, corneal epithelial defects, wound dehiscence, recurrence, infection, and cosmetic outcomes.
resultsA total of 14 trials evaluating 909 eyes of 657 patients were included in our study. Compared with the levator plication, the frontalis sling significantly increased the MRD1 (MD = - 1.21; 95% CI [- 1.69, - 0.73]), and the levator resection significantly increased the PFH (MD = 1.30; 95% CI [0.27, 2.33]). For the frontalis sling surgical patterns, the fox pentagon was significantly better than the double triangle at improving the degree of lagophthalmos (MD = 0.70; 95% CI [0.32, 1.08]), while the opened pattern provided statistically better cosmetic outcome than the closed frontalis sling. Analysis of surgical material showed that absorbable sutures significantly increased the MRD1 (MD = 1.16; 95% CI [0.60, 1.72]) compared to non-absorbable sutures when used in levator plication; frontalis sling surgeries performed with silicon rods significantly increased the PFH (MD = 0.88; 95% CI [0.29, 1.47]) compared to those performed with Gore-Tex strips, while autogenous fascia lata provided statistically better aesthetic outcome for lid height symmetry and contour.
conclusionDifferent surgical methods and materials appear to affect different aspects of the congenital ptosis treatment outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.