Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37145316›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2023

Evaluation of distal tibial epiphysis and calcaneal epiphysis according to the Vieth method in 3.0 T magnetic resonance images: a pilot study.

Murat Serdar Gurses, Busra Has, Hasan Baki Altinsoy, Halit Sinan Suzen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Murat Serdar GursesAda Basari OSGB, Sakarya, Turkey. muratserdargurses@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9982-0476
Busra HasDepartment of Radiology, Nevsehir State Hospital, Nevsehir, Turkey. hasbusra@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2963-2696
Hasan Baki AltinsoyDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Duzce University, Duzce, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-3600
Halit Sinan SuzenDepartment of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1779-5850
Ankara University · TRDüzce Üniversitesi · TRNevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University · TRSakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In forensic medicine practice, age estimation-both in living and deceased individuals-can be requested due to legal requirements. Radiologic methods, such as X-rays, for the estimation of bone age have been discussed, and ethical concerns have been raised. Given these factors, radiologic methods that reduce radiation exposure have gained importance and have become one of the research topics in forensic medicine. In this study, the MR images of the ankles of patients aged between 8 and 25 years, obtained with a 3.0 T MR scanner, were evaluated retrospectively according to the staging method defined by Vieth et al. In the study, the ankle MR images of 201 cases (83 females and 118 males) with sagittal T1-weighted turbo spin echo and T2-weighted short tau inversion recovery sequences were evaluated independently by two observers. According to the results of our study, the intra- and inter-observer agreements are at a very good level for both the distal tibial and calcaneal epiphyses. All the cases detected as stages 2, 3, and 4 in both sexes for both the distal tibial and the calcaneal epiphyses have been determined to be under the age of 18 years. According to the data obtained from our study, we consider that stage 5 for males and stage 6 for both sexes in the distal tibial epiphysis and stage 6 for males in the calcaneal epiphysis can be used to estimate the age of 15 years. As far as we know, our study is the first to evaluate ankle MR images with the method defined by Vieth et al. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the validity of the procedure.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonOsteogenesisAdolescentAdultChildEpiphysesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult3.0 T MR imagesAge estimationAnkleVieth method

Identifiers

PMID37145316
OpenAlexW4372295761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.