Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37145245›Full record

Observational studyDrugs & aging2023

Prospective Observational Study Evaluating the Prognostic Value of the G8 Screening Tool for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Who Received Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitor plus Platinum-Etoposide Chemotherapy.

Kenji Morimoto, Tadaaki Yamada, Takayuki Takeda, Shinsuke Shiotsu, Koji Date, Taishi Harada, Nobuyo Tamiya, Yusuke Chihara, Yoshizumi Takemura, Takahiro Yamada and 7 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Drugs & aging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Frailty Scale versus Geriatric-8 in predicting quality of life among older adults receiving curative cancer treatment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kenji MorimotoDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Tadaaki YamadaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan. tayamada@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-281X
Takayuki TakedaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Shinsuke ShiotsuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji DateDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Kyoto Chubu Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Taishi HaradaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Nobuyo TamiyaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yusuke ChiharaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Uji-Tokushukai Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshizumi TakemuraDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Otsu City Hospital, Shiga, Japan.
Takahiro YamadaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hibiki KandaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Omi Medical Center, Shiga, Japan.
Masaki IshidaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Akihiro YoshimuraDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Masahiro IwasakuDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Shinsaku TokudaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Young Hak KimDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Koichi TakayamaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465, Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPFukuyama City Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Society Kyoto Daini Hospital · JPKyoto first Red Cross hospital · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPOtsu Municipal Hospital · JPRakuwakai Otowa Hospital · JPShiga Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy is used as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), regardless of age.

objectiveWe examined the role of the Geriatric 8 (G8) screening tool for evaluating treatment outcomes in patients with ES-SCLC treated with PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy as first-line therapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween September 2019 and October 2021, we prospectively evaluated patients with ES-SCLC treated with immunochemotherapy at ten institutions in Japan. The G8 score was assessed before treatment initiation.

resultsWe evaluated 44 patients with ES-SCLC. Patients with G8 score > 11 had longer overall survival (OS) than those with G8 score ≤ 11 (not reached versus 8.3 months; log-rank test, p = 0.005). In univariate and multivariate analyses, G8 score > 11 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.75; p = 0.008 and HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.14-0.82; p = 0.02, respectively) and performance status (PS) of 2 (HR 5.42; 95% CI 2.08-14.2; p < 0.001 and HR 6.94; 95% CI 2.25-21.4; p < 0.001, respectively) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Among patients with good PS (0 or 1), the OS in patients with G8 score > 11 was significantly longer than that in patients with G8 score ≤ 11 (not reached versus 12.3 months; log-rank test, p = 0.02).

conclusionsG8 score evaluation before treatment initiation was useful as a prognostic factor for ES-SCLC patients who received PD-L1 inhibitors and platinum-etoposide chemotherapy, even with good PS.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenEarly Detection of CancerEtoposideHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPlatinumPrognosisB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanEtoposideImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPlatinum

Identifiers

PMID37145245
OpenAlexW4372318202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.